Skip to main content

Using Variation of Multiplicity in Highlighting Critical Aspects of Multiple Solution Tasks and Modeling Tasks

  • Chapter
Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Variation

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teaching and Learning ((MTAL))

Abstract

We urge the reader to solve these problems before reading the paper. Then we suggest that the reader asks himself whether there is a different route or a different analysis of the given situation that leads to a different solution to any of the problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blum, M., & Leiβ, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical Modeling (ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 222–231). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, V., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modeling, applications, and links to other subjects – State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elia, I., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kolovou A. (2009). Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42–53). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. A. (Eds.). (1999). Classrooms that promote mathematical understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, P. A., & Coxford, A.F. (1995). Connecting mathematics across the curriculum: 1995 Yearbook. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, O. N., Park, J. S., & Park, J. H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2003). Problem-solving preferences of mathematics teachers: Focusing on symmetry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 297–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2007). Habits of mind associated with advanced mathematical thinking and solution spaces of mathematical tasks. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippo (Eds.), Proceeding of The Fifth Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education – CERME-5 (pp. 2330–2339) (CD-ROM and On-line). Retrieved June 2, 2016, from http://ermeweb.free.fr/Cerme5.pdf

  • Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Beyond constructivism: A model and modeling perspective on teaching, learning, and problem solving in mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591–645). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on mathematical creativity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, M. L., & Marton, F. (2012). Toward a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Science, 15, 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maaβ, K. (2006). What are modelling competencies? ZDM Mathematics Education, 38, 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, I., & Balacheff, N. (2011). Beyond realistic considerations: Modeling conceptions and controls in task examples with simple word problems. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peled, I., & Bassan-Cincenatus, R. (2005). Degrees of freedom in modeling: Taking certainty out of proportion. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning and teaching problem solving. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryve, A., Nilsson, P., & Mason, J. (2012). Establishing mathematics for teaching within classroom interactions in teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). What do we know about mathematics curricula? Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 13, 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM Mathematics Education, 3, 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., & Newton, k. J. (2009). The nature and development of experts’ strategy flexibility for solving equations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 557–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler J. W., & Hiebert J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbeyns, J. De Smedt, B. Ghesquiere, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Jump or compensate? Strategy flexibility in the number domain up to 100. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peled, I., Leikin, R. (2017). Using Variation of Multiplicity in Highlighting Critical Aspects of Multiple Solution Tasks and Modeling Tasks. In: Huang, R., Li, Y. (eds) Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Variation. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-782-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-782-5_19

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-782-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics