Skip to main content

Developing Algebraic Reasoning through Variation in the U.S.

  • Chapter
Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Variation

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teaching and Learning ((MTAL))

Abstract

Historically, algebra in the U.S. has been viewed “as a gatekeeper to a college education and the careers such education affords” (Kilpatrick & Izsák, 2008, p. 11). As such, current curriculum documents emphasize the need to support all students in learning algebra (Common Core State Standards Initiative [CCSSI], 2010; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM], 1989, 2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • APPA Group (led by Sutherland, R.). (2004). A toolkit for analyzing approaches to algebra. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (pp. 73–96). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M. L. (2008). Algebra and the elementary classroom: Transforming thinking, transforming practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2003). Developing elementary teachers’: “Algebra eyes and ears.” Teaching Children Mathematics, 10, 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 412–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E. Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J. S. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46, 39–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 669–705). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Earnest, D. (2014). Exploring functions in elementary school: Leveraging the representational context. In K. Karp (Ed.), Annual perspectives in mathematics education: Using research to improve instruction (pp. 171–179). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. (2014). Developing learning environments which support early algebraic reasoning: A case from a New Zealand primary school. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 659–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–17). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi, E. (1998). Discourse that promotes conceptual understanding. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4, 410–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J., & Izsák, A. (2008). A history of algebra in the school curriculum. In C. E. Greenes (Ed.), Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics: Seventieth yearbook (pp. 3–18). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. (2012). Variation and mathematics pedagogy. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 433–440). Singapore: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, M. L. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lins, R., & Kaput, J. J. (2004). The early development of algebraic reasoning: The current state of the field. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI study (pp. 45–70). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, M. L., & Marton, F. (2012). Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1, 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Science, 15, 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 3–36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). The Ontario curriculum: Grades 1–8 mathematics. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Paying attention to algebraic reasoning. Retrieved from http://edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/PayingAttentiontoAlgebra.pdf

  • Soares, J., Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Thinking algebraically across the elementary school curriculum. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12, 228–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, K., & Chick, H. (2004). Solving the problem with algebra. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2008). Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: Actions that support 8 year olds’ thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barlow, A.T., Prince, K.M., Lischka, A.E., Duncan, M.D. (2017). Developing Algebraic Reasoning through Variation in the U.S.. In: Huang, R., Li, Y. (eds) Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Variation. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-782-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-782-5_18

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-782-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics