Skip to main content

Making Room in Engineering Design

  • Chapter
Engineering Professionalism

Part of the book series: Professional Practice and Education ((PPAE))

  • 339 Accesses

Abstract

What are professionals up against when trying to reshape and revitalize current ways of doing engineering? How to make room for new perspectives and approaches? Is it enough to hire new types of engineers with different sets of competences? Or does it take something else to allow new ways of doing engineering to thrive in the workplace?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S., & Sundblad, Y. (2008). Usability and interaction design: New challenges for the Scandinavian tradition. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(4), 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D., & Sundblad, Y. (2000). Co-operative design: Perspectives on 20 years with ‘the Scandinavian IT Design Model’. Proceedings of NordiCHI, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, A. (2015). Studying engineering practice. In S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamision, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, & B. Newberry (Eds.), Engineering identities, epistemologies and values: Engineering education and practice in context (Vol. 2, pp. 59–73). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, A. (2016). Ideas of holistic engineering meet engineering work practices. Engineering Studies, 8(2), 140–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Ozgur Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2012). How to conduct a practice-based study: Problems and methods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (1999). What is at stake–and is not–in the idea and practice of multi-sited ethnography. Canberra Anthropology, 22(2), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E. (2006). The story of socio-technical design: Reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Information Systems Journal, 16(4), 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. P. (2015). Practicing and changing engineering design: A practice perspective on challenges in engineering design education (PhD dissertation). Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2012). A primer on practices: Theory and research. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 13–26). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2015). Praxistheorie als Flache Ontologie [Practice Theory as Flat Ontology]. In H. Schäfer (Ed.), Praxistheorie: Ein Soziologisches Forschungsprogramm (pp. 29–44). Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. R. (2014). Practice-focused ethnographies of higher education: Method/ological corollaries of a social practice perspective. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petersen, R.P., Buch, A. (2016). Making Room in Engineering Design. In: Jørgensen, U., Brodersen, S. (eds) Engineering Professionalism. Professional Practice and Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-752-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-752-8_9

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-752-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics