Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation in Science and Technology Education and Communication through Design Thinking

  • Chapter
Science and Technology Education and Communication

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 15))

Abstract

The central issue of this chapter are the challenges of innovation in science and technology education and science and technology communication practice, and how design thinking is supportive to attain these challenges. What is the drama? Many professionals in both domains would like to improve their practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aujang, S. Y. (2006). Engineering: An endless frontier. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub, P. (2008). Why designing is best described as complex problem solving – and why designers are best describes as human beings (pp. 3–26). Course Reader, Faculty Industrial Design, Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. H. (1994). Sociology and the new systems theory: Toward a theoretical synthesis. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. (2012). When mind, heart, and hands meet: communication design and designers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 489–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies, 25, 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, A. (1980). Methods for deriving criteria for assessing the quality of medical care. Medical Care Review, 37(7), 653–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippoupoliti, A. (2010). Science exhibitions: Curation and design. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, K. (2003). Theory construction in design research: Criteria: approaches, and methods. Design Studies, 24, 507–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (2006). The dual nature of technical artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohs, U. (2008). Co-designing social systems by designing technical artifacts. In P. E. Vermaas et al. (Eds.), Philosophy and Design. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2008). A cautious Promotheus? A few steps towards a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk). Design History Society, September 2008, Falmouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2010). Rethinking communication in innovation processes: Creating space for change in complex systems. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein, B.V. (2003). Models of public communication of science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37, 596–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, A. W. M. (2000). ‘The relational ontology of technical artefacts. In P. A. Kroes & A. W. M. Meijers (Eds.), The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology (pp. 81–96). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriënboer, J. G. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Delimmas in general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozenburg, N. F. M., & Eekels, J. (2003). Productontwerpen, structuur en methoden. Utrecht: Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellens, P. J., & Klaassen, R. (2002). Communicatiekundig ontwerpen. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeborn, D. (2011). Organization as communication: A Luhmannian perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 663–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). This service design thinking. Amsterdam: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tromp, N. (2013). Social design: How products and services can help us act in ways that benefit society (Thesis). Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Aken, J. E. (2005). Valid knowledge for the professional design of large and complex design processes. Design Studies, 26, 379–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aken, J. E. (2007). Design science and organization development interventions: Aligning business and humanistic values. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(1), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Flipse, S. M. (2015). A cybernetic dream: How a crisis in social sciences leads us to a Communication for Innovation-Laboratory. Journal of Science Communication, 14(01), Y01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Meijman, F. J. (2007). Medische publiekscommunicatie: De contouren van systeemtheorie. In J. Willems (Ed.), Basisboek wetenschapscommunicatie. Amsterdam: Boom,

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Meijman, F. J. (2008). Dialogue guides awareness and understanding of science: An essay on different goals of dialogue leading to different science communication approaches. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Meijman, F. J. (2012). A step-by-step approach for science communication practitioners: A design perspective. Journal of Science Communication, 11(2), A03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sanden, M. C. A., & Osseweijer, P. (2011). Effectively embedding science communication in academia: A second paradigm shift? In D. J Bennett & R. C. Jennings (Eds.), Successful science communication: Telling like it is. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sanden, M. C. A., Van Dam, K. H., Stragier, J., & Kobus, C. B. A. (2013). Simulation based decision support for strategic communication and marketing management concerning the consumer introduction of smart energy systems. Journal for Communication Studies, 6(1), 75–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Education and Communication, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Maarten C. A. van der Sanden

  2. Science Education and Communication, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Marc J. de Vries

Authors
  1. Maarten C. A. van der Sanden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc J. de Vries
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Maarten C. A. van der Sanden

  2. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    Marc J. de Vries

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Sanden, M.C.A., de Vries, M.J. (2016). Innovation in Science and Technology Education and Communication through Design Thinking. In: van der Sanden, M.C.A., de Vries, M.J. (eds) Science and Technology Education and Communication. International Technology Education Studies, vol 15. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-738-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-738-2_8

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-738-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation