Skip to main content

(Un)Democratic Curriculum for a Democratic Educational World

  • Chapter
  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

Let’s dream about that educational world where every child truly is free to make her/his learning decision and they are well supported, encouraged, and succeed. I am taking John Dewey’s stance to define a democratic curriculum that needs “a continuous reconstruction” (Dewey, 1902, p. 11) to connect the learner’s present experience to all possible new experiences. I believe in that educational world where the creative possibility of each child, no matter from which context the child comes, is in highest level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Apple, M. W. (2013). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. (2006). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandwein, P. F. (1977). What is curriculum? National Elementary Principal, 57(1), 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J., & Miles, M. T. (2008). From scientific management to social justice—and back again? Pedagogical shifts in the study and practice of educational leadership. In A. H. Normore (Ed.), Leadership for social justice: Promoting equity and excellence through inquiry and reflective practice (pp. 99–114). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (n.d.). Myths vs. facts. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/myths-vs-facts/

  • Curriculum Development Center (CDC). (2007). National curriculum framework. Bhaktapur, Nepal: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, L. W. (2014). English language learners at the crossroads of educational reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 624–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., & Christian, D. (2005). English language learners in US schools: An overview of research findings. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(4), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F., & Whitehead, B. M. (2006). Curriculum leadership: Development and implementation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, C. (1998). Educational leadership for democratic purpose: What do we mean? International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T. B. (1984). Leaders and schools: Willfulness and non-natural order in organization. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice (pp. 142–169). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenlink, P. M. (2001). Beyond the knowledge base controversy: Advancing the ideal of scholar-practioner leadership. In T. J. Kowalski & G. Perreault (Eds.), 21st century challenges for school administrators (pp. 65–88). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanno, Y., & Kangas, S. (2014). “I’m not going to be, like, for the AP”: English language learners’ limited access to advanced college-preparatory courses in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 848–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, D. (2012). Theory and practice of curriculum studies. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahiri, J. (Ed.). (2005). What they don’t learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth (New literacies and digital epistemologies). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K., & Kleyn, T. (2010). The long-term impact of subtractive schooling in the educational experiences of secondary English Language Learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(4), 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. (1975). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, C. M. (2004). Dialogic leadership for social justice: Overcoming pathologies of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, C. M. (2013). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable change in an uncertain and complex world. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slattery, P. (2012). Curriculum development in the postmodern era: Teaching and learning in an age of accountability. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, S., & Taylor, L. (2013). Understanding curriculum as lived: Teaching for social justice and equity goals. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(3), 406–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, K. (2006). The impact of a high school graduation examination on Mississippi social studies teachers’ instructional practices. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 273–302). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. (2008). Leading curriculum development. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, J. W., & Bondi, J. C. (2007). Curriculum development: A guide to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylimaki, R. M. (2012). Curriculum leadership in a conservative era. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 304–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gautam, C. (2016). (Un)Democratic Curriculum for a Democratic Educational World. In: Lowery, C., Walker, A., Thomas, C. (eds) Un-Democratic Acts. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-723-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-723-8_7

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-723-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics