Skip to main content

Recognising Intimation

An Affective Reality in the Act of Creation

  • Chapter
Book cover Publishing Higher Degree Research

Abstract

Noted psychologist Graham Wallas (1926, p. 11), hoping to transform the processes of human thought and solve significant problems, wrote early last century that “We can to some degree control Illumination by making ourselves conscious (as many poets are conscious) of Intimation…”. Illumination is an important event in the act of creation within the context of novel problem solving. It is the stage in the process whereby a solution, or the means of finding the solution to a problem, becomes manifest in the individual’s mind. It is often referred to as the “aha” moment; the turning point whereby a path to a solution can be navigated through the problem solving space. Consequently, anything that facilitates the onset of Illumination must influence the manifestation of a solution and, of necessity, provide a more complete understanding about the solving of novel problems and the expression of creativity. When Wallas advocated that Illumination could be facilitated, even controlled, by attending to an associated substage called “Intimation”, he was making a profound claim. But is the claim valid? Is there any substance to the idea that individuals can feel their way to a solution in a novel problem solving event? This chapter attends to the provision of evidence about such a claim. But what exactly is Intimation, and in relative terms, why is so very little known about it?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldous, C. R. (2001). Measuring cognitive and non-cognitive systems of reasoning: Some preliminary findings. International Education Journal, 2(4), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldous, C. R. (2009). The genesis of new ideas: models, feeling and solutions. In B. Matthews & T. Gibbons (Eds.). The process of research in education (pp. 338–370). Adelaide: Shannon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldous, C. R. (2014). Attending to feeling: It may matter more than you think. Creative Education, 5, 780–96. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.510091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Ma: MIT Press. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion reason and the human brain. London: Papermac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens. London: William Heinemann. Jeffries, D. A. (2011). Cognitive and non-cognitive processes: Students’ perceptions about and employment of approaches to reasoning in novel mathematics problem solving. Unpublished Honours thesis. Adelaide: Flinders University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Maryborough, Victoria: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, J. P. (1986). Performance Cycle. International Journal of Education Research, 10, 143–58. Miriam-Webster Dictionary (2012). Retrieved from http://www.merriamwebster.com/thesaurus/intimation

  • (OED) Oxford Dictionary of English (2010) (3rd ed.). Angus Stevenson (Ed). Oxford, UK: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellin, N., & Keeves, J. P. (1997). Path analysis with latent variables. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 633–40). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, S. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. P. (1989). The eureka process: A structure for the creative experience in science and engineering. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 286-98. doi.:10.1080/10400418909534325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926), The art of thought. London, Great Britain: Jonathan Cape Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jeffries, D., Aldous, C.R. (2016). Recognising Intimation. In: Orrell, J., Curtis, D.D. (eds) Publishing Higher Degree Research. Higher Education Horizons. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-672-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-672-9_11

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-672-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics