Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the vital issues addressed in this part of the book and to reflect on the contextual background of policymaking and policy enactment of educational technology in schools. This section centres around the Norwegian social context as an example discussion case.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L. (1993). Computers meet classroom: Classroom wins. The Teachers College Record, 95(2), 185–210.
Cuban, L. (2009). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cuban, L. (2013). Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform in teaching practice?. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 109–125.
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.
Giske, T. (2000, August 7). Giske expect school revolution. ITU-magasinet.
Giske, T. (2001). Lecture at the University College of Vestfold.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London: Routledge.
ITU. (2003). Digital dannelse. Oslo: ITU.
Kluge, L. (2001, July 5). Reformforsøk i 700 skoler. Aftenposten.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning. Making the connection. Paris: OECD.
Prøitz, T. S. (2014). Conceptualisations of learning outcomes in education-an explorative cross-case analysis of policymakers, teachers and scholars (PhD thesis). University of Oslo, Oslo.
Säljö, R. (2001). Læring i praksis. Et sosiokulturelt perspektiv. Oslo: JW Cappelens forlag.
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.
Skaar, H., & Hammer, H. (2013). Why students plagiarise from the internet: The views and practices in three Norwegian upper secondary classrooms. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 9(2), s.15–34.
Skagen, K. (2014). Digitalisering som statlig avdidaktisering av klasserommet. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 98(06), 440–451.
Skrede, S. (2004, December 20). Hvorfor er norske elever svake i fag og på topp i bråk? Aftenposten, p. 11.
Todal, P. A. (2015, February). Ein stor og naiv entusiasme. Dag og Tid, 20.
White Paper. (2009). The teacher. The role and the education (White paper no 11). Oslo: Ministry of Education.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elstad, E. (2016). Educational Technology in Schools. In: Elstad, E. (eds) Digital Expectations and Experiences in Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-648-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-648-4_3
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-648-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)