Abstract
Digital media has a growing importance and it affects people’s communication habits and patterns and their attitudes towards school learning. We need greater understanding as to how learning takes place in various arenas, how these arenas dynamically interact, and how this affects the educational environments. The chapters in this part of the book contribute to our understanding of these phenomena.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bagdikian, B. H. (2014). The new media monopoly. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Beavis, C. (2013). Young people, new media and education: Participation and possibilities. Social Alternatives, 32(2), 39.
Bennett, A., & Robards, B. (2014). Introduction: Youth, cultural practice and media technologies. In A. Bennett & B. Robards (Eds.), Mediated youth cultures (pp. 1–7). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331.
Biesta, G. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society. Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Biesta, G. (2016). ICT and education beyond learning: A framework for analysis, development and critique. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Blumberg, F. C., Blades, M., & Oates, C. (2015). Youth and new media. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Buckingham, D., & Willett, R. (2013). Digital generations: Children, young people, and the new media. New York, NY: Routledge.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2016). Reading multimodal texts for learning. A model for cultivating multimodal literacy. Designs for Learning.
Elstad, E. (2006). Understanding the nature of accountability failure in a technology-filled, laissez-faire classroom: Disaffected students and teachers who give in. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 459–481.
Elstad, E. (2016). Why is there a wedge between the promise of educational technology and the experiences of a technology-rich pioneer school? In E. Elstad (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Gardner, H. (2012). Truth, beauty, and goodness reframed: Educating for the virtues in the age of truthiness and twitter. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gee, J. P. (2014). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Greeno, J. G. (2011). A situative perspective on cognition and learning in interaction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice (pp. 41–71). New York, NY: Springer.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K. Z., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kress, G. (2015). Semiotic work: Applied linguistics and a social semiotic account of multimodality. AILA Review, 28(1), 49–71.
Kress, G., & Selander, S. (2012). Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 265–268.
Linn, M. C. (2013). Internet environments for science education. Abingdon: Routledge.
Mihailidis, P., & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media literacy as a core competency for engaged citizenship in participatory democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1611–1622.
Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the net generation. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.
OECD. (2011). The OECD programme for international assessment of adult competencies (PIAAC). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/13/45/41690983.pdf
OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning. Making the connection. Paris: OECD.
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2013). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly – The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). The 1987 presidential address: Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16, 13–20, 54.
Rucker, R. (2013). Mind tools: The five levels of mathematical reality. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.
Sanger, L. (2010). Individual knowledge in the internet age. EDUCAUSE Review, 45, 14–24. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ne-sa/3.0/
Sarason, S. B. (1984). If it can be studied or developed, should it be? American Psychologist, 39, 477–485.
Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190222/
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Spector, J. M., Lockee, B. B., Smaldino, S., & Herring, M. (2013). Learning, problem solving, and mindtools: Essays in Honor of David H. Jonassen. Abingdon: Routledge.
Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.
Vavik, L., & Salomon, G. (2015). Twenty first century skills vs. disciplinary studies? In Y. Rosen, S. Ferrara, & M. Mosharraf (Eds.), Handbook of research on technology tools for real-world skill development (Vol. 1, pp. 1–12). New York, NY: IGI Global.
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Williamson, B. (2013). The future of the curriculum: School knowledge in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yang, K. J., Chu, H. C., & Yang, K. H. (2015, July). Using the augmented reality technique to develop visualization mindtools for chemical inquiry-based activities. In Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 2015 IIAI 4th International Congress on (pp. 354–357). IEEE.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arnesen, T., Elstad, E., Salomon, G., Vavik, L. (2016). Educational Technology and Polycontextual Bridging. In: Elstad, E. (eds) Educational Technology and Polycontextual Bridging. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-645-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-645-3_1
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-645-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)