Abstract
Curriculum design that focuses heavily on learning outcomes (see for example, Hussey & Smith, 2008) does not necessarily provide sufficient focus on the learning trajectories used by students to achieve the outcomes. Therefore, some students may arrive at a given outcome via a direct route whilst others may have taken a more circuitous journey to arrive at the same place.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adey, P., Fairbrother, R., & Wiliam, D. (1999). Learning styles and strategies: A review of research. London: King’s College.
Beattie, V., Collins, B., & McInnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: A simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1), 1–12.
Bradley, J. H., Paul, R., & Seeman, E. (2006). Analyzing the structure of expert knowledge. Information Management, 43, 77–91.
Cannella, G. S., & Reiff, J. C. (1994). Individual constructivist teacher education: Teachers as empowered learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(3), 27–38.
Caravita, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89–111.
Clifton, C., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1981). Integrating new information with old knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 142–148.
DeCossart, L., & Fish, D. (2005). Cultivating the thinking surgeon: New perspectives on clinical teaching, learning and assessment. Shrewsbury: tfm Publishing.
Derbentseva, N., Safayeni, F., & Cañas, A. J. (2007). Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 448–465.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. London: Routledge.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–390.
Hay, D. (2007). Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non-learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 39–58.
Hay, D. B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2006). Using concept maps to reveal conceptual typologies. Education + Training, 48(2/3), 127–142.
Hay, D., & Kinchin, I. M. (2008). Using concept mapping to measure learning quality. Education + Training, 50(2), 167–182.
Hay, D., Kinchin, I. M., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295–311.
Hoffman, R. R., & Lintern, G. (2006). Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 203–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, R. E. (1998). Visual language: Global communication for the 21st century. Bainbridge Island, WA. MacroVU Inc.
Howie, P., & Bagnall, R. (2013). A critique of the deep and surface approaches to learning model. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 389–400.
Howie, P., & Bagnall, R. (2015). A critical comparison of transformation and deep approach theories of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(3), 348–365. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2014.1000409
Huai, H. (1997). Concept mapping in learning biology: Theoretical review on cognitive and learning styles. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3/4), 325–340.
Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2008). Learning outcomes: A conceptual analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 107–115.
Jones, M. G., Carter, G., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Exploring the development of conceptual ecologies: Communities of concepts related to convection and heat. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 139–159.
Jones, S. A., Forbes, B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2008, November 10). The use of concept mapping to enhance the teaching of fundamental pharmaceutics to undergraduate pharmacy students. Poster presented at a joint symposium of the Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London, UK.
Katz, J. (1988). Why doctors don’t disclose uncertainty. In J. Dowie & A. Elstein (Eds.), Professional judgment: A reader in clinical decision making (pp. 544–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 145–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kinchin, I. M. (2000). From ‘ecologist’ to ‘conceptual ecologist’: The utility of the conceptual ecology analogy for teachers of biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 178–183.
Kinchin, I. M. (2011). Relating knowledge structures to learning styles and university teaching. In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management (pp. 129–142). London: Routledge.
Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43–57.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1 – Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.
Pedrosa de Jesus, H. T., Almeida, P. A., Teixeira-Dias, J. J., & Watts, M. (2006). Students’ questions: Building a bridge between Kolb’s learning styles and approaches to learning. Education and Training, 48(2/3), 97–111.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17(1&2), 5–27.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.
Safayeni, F., Derbentseva, N., & Cañas, A. J. (2005). A theoretical note on concepts and the need for cyclic concept maps. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 741–766.
Schmeck, R. R. (1988). Strategies and styles of learning: An integration of varied perspectives. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 317–347). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Schmidt, H. G., Norman, G. R., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1990). A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and applications. Academic Medicine, 65(10), 611–621.
Shambaugh, R. N. (1995). The cognitive potential of visual constructions. Journal of Visual Literacy, 15(1), 7–24.
Silverman, L. K. (1989). The visual-spatial learner. Preventing School Failure, 34(1), 15–20.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). New York, NY: SUNY Press.
Tormey, R. (2014). The centre cannot hold: Untangling two different trajectories of the ‘approaches to teaching’ framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–12.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding. Volume 1, General introduction and part 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 523–536.
Wallace, D. S., West, S. W. C., Ware, A., & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). The effect of knowledge maps that incorporate gestalt principles on learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 67(1), 5–16.
Weurlander, M., Scheja, M., Hult, H., & Wernerson, A. (2014). The struggle to understand: Exploring medical students’ experiences of learning and understanding during a basic science course. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 462–477. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.930122
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kinchin, I.M. (2016). Patterns of Learning. In: Visualising Powerful Knowledge to Develop the Expert Student. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-627-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-627-9_3
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-627-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)