Skip to main content
  • 488 Accesses

Abstract

Curriculum design that focuses heavily on learning outcomes (see for example, Hussey & Smith, 2008) does not necessarily provide sufficient focus on the learning trajectories used by students to achieve the outcomes. Therefore, some students may arrive at a given outcome via a direct route whilst others may have taken a more circuitous journey to arrive at the same place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adey, P., Fairbrother, R., & Wiliam, D. (1999). Learning styles and strategies: A review of research. London: King’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, V., Collins, B., & McInnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: A simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J. H., Paul, R., & Seeman, E. (2006). Analyzing the structure of expert knowledge. Information Management, 43, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, G. S., & Reiff, J. C. (1994). Individual constructivist teacher education: Teachers as empowered learners. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(3), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caravita, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1981). Integrating new information with old knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCossart, L., & Fish, D. (2005). Cultivating the thinking surgeon: New perspectives on clinical teaching, learning and assessment. Shrewsbury: tfm Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbentseva, N., Safayeni, F., & Cañas, A. J. (2007). Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 448–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. (2007). Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non-learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2006). Using concept maps to reveal conceptual typologies. Education + Training, 48(2/3), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D., & Kinchin, I. M. (2008). Using concept mapping to measure learning quality. Education + Training, 50(2), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D., Kinchin, I. M., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. R., & Lintern, G. (2006). Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 203–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, R. E. (1998). Visual language: Global communication for the 21st century. Bainbridge Island, WA. MacroVU Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howie, P., & Bagnall, R. (2013). A critique of the deep and surface approaches to learning model. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(4), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howie, P., & Bagnall, R. (2015). A critical comparison of transformation and deep approach theories of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(3), 348–365. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2014.1000409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huai, H. (1997). Concept mapping in learning biology: Theoretical review on cognitive and learning styles. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8(3/4), 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2008). Learning outcomes: A conceptual analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G., Carter, G., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Exploring the development of conceptual ecologies: Communities of concepts related to convection and heat. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. A., Forbes, B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2008, November 10). The use of concept mapping to enhance the teaching of fundamental pharmaceutics to undergraduate pharmacy students. Poster presented at a joint symposium of the Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1988). Why doctors don’t disclose uncertainty. In J. Dowie & A. Elstein (Eds.), Professional judgment: A reader in clinical decision making (pp. 544–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 145–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M. (2000). From ‘ecologist’ to ‘conceptual ecologist’: The utility of the conceptual ecology analogy for teachers of biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 178–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M. (2011). Relating knowledge structures to learning styles and university teaching. In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management (pp. 129–142). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1 – Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrosa de Jesus, H. T., Almeida, P. A., Teixeira-Dias, J. J., & Watts, M. (2006). Students’ questions: Building a bridge between Kolb’s learning styles and approaches to learning. Education and Training, 48(2/3), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17(1&2), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safayeni, F., Derbentseva, N., & Cañas, A. J. (2005). A theoretical note on concepts and the need for cyclic concept maps. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 741–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R. (1988). Strategies and styles of learning: An integration of varied perspectives. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 317–347). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., Norman, G. R., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1990). A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and applications. Academic Medicine, 65(10), 611–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, R. N. (1995). The cognitive potential of visual constructions. Journal of Visual Literacy, 15(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (1989). The visual-spatial learner. Preventing School Failure, 34(1), 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). New York, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tormey, R. (2014). The centre cannot hold: Untangling two different trajectories of the ‘approaches to teaching’ framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding. Volume 1, General introduction and part 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D. S., West, S. W. C., Ware, A., & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). The effect of knowledge maps that incorporate gestalt principles on learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 67(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weurlander, M., Scheja, M., Hult, H., & Wernerson, A. (2014). The struggle to understand: Exploring medical students’ experiences of learning and understanding during a basic science course. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 462–477. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.930122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kinchin, I.M. (2016). Patterns of Learning. In: Visualising Powerful Knowledge to Develop the Expert Student. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-627-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-627-9_3

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-627-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics