Abstract
This chapter describes the elements of caring supervision of doctoral theses. The purpose is to describe the best practices and challenges of supervision especially from the supervisor’s perspective. The analysis is based on the author’s extensive experience as a supervisor and related data obtained for research and developmental purposes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265–278. doi:10.1080/13562510600680574
Atkins, M., & Brown, G. (1988). Effective teacher in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Berg, I. K., & DeJong, P. (2005). Engagement through complimenting. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 16(1–2), 51–56. doi:10.1300/J085v16no1_11
Booth, W. C., Clombs, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2003). A craft to research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Boud, D., & Lee, A. (Eds.). (2009). Changing practices of doctoral education. London & New York, NY: Routledge.
Burton, J. P., & Hoobler, J. M. (2006). Subordinate self-esteem and abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(3), 340–355.
Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52. doi:10.1080/030750700116000
Cho, K., Schunn, C., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing. Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23(3), 260–294. doi:10.1177/0741088306289261
Costley, C., & Stephenson, J. (2009). Building doctorates around individual candidates’ professional experience. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 171–186). London & New York, NY: Routledge.
Cryer, R. (2003). The research student’s guide to success. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Cullen, D., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2000). Supervising the PhD. A guide to success. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Denzin, N. (1989). Interpretative interactionism (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 16). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dill, D., Mitra, S., Jensen, H., Lehtinen, E., Mäkelä, T., Parpala, A., Pohjola, H., Ritter, M. A., & Saari, S. (2006). PhD training and the knowledge based society: An evaluation of doctoral education in Finland. International Postgraduate Students Mirror 2006. Helsinki: Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council.
Doncaster, K., & Lester, S. (2002). Capability and its development: Experiences from a work-based doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 91–101. doi:10.1080/03075070120099395
Dunleavy, P. (2003). Authoring a PhD. How to plan, draft, write and finish a doctoral thesis or dissertation. Hampshire: Palgrave.
Ellis, K., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2001). Trust in top management and immediate supervisor: The relationship to satisfaction, perceived organizational effectiveness, and information receiving. Communication Quarterly, 49(4), 382–398. doi:10.1080/01463370109385637
Ellis, M. V., & Dell, D. M. (1986). Dimensionality of supervisor roles: Supervisors’ perceptions of supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(3), 282–291.
Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273. doi:10.1080/158037042000225245
Evans, T., & Kamler, B. (2005). The need for counter-scrutiny: Taking a broad view of doctoral education research. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(2), 115–118. doi:10.1080/07294360500062805
Ferguson, T. (2009). The “write” skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctoral students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285–297. doi:10.1080/03098260902734968
Flint, A. S., Kurumada, K. S., Fisher, T., & Zisook, K. (2011). Creating the perfect storm in professional development: The experiences of two American teachers and a university research team. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 95–109. doi:10.1080/19415250903425502
Golde, C. M. (2000). “Should I stay or should I go?”: Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 199–227. doi:10.1353/rhe.2000.0004
Golde, C. M. (2007). Signature pedagogies in doctoral education: Are they adaptable for the preparation of education researches. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 344–351. doi:10.3102/0013189X07308301
Golding, C., Sharmini, S., & Lazarovitch, A. (2014). What examiners do: What thesis students should know. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 563–576. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.859230
Grant, B. M. (2005). Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 337–354. doi:10.1080/09518390500092483
Green, H., & Powell, S. (2005). Doctoral study in contemporary higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Halse, C. (2011). ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students’ views of supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 41–53. doi:10.1080/07294360220124648
Johnston, S. (1997). Examining the examiners: An analysis of examiners’ reports on doctoral theses. Studies in Higher Education, 22(3), 333–347. doi:10.1080/03075079712331380936
Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 283–294. doi:10.1080/03075070802049236
Kearns, H., Gardiner, M., & Marshall, K. (2008). Innovation in PhD completion: The hardy shall succeed (and be happy!). Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 77–89. doi:10.1080/07294360701658781
Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 461–470. doi:10.1080/13562510701415433
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacy’s approach. In M. Lea & B. Stieres (Eds.), Student writing in higher education. New contexts (pp. 32–46). Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education.
Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 107–123. doi:10.1037/a0024610
Lindén, J., Ohlin, M., & Brodin, E. M. (2013). Mentorship, supervision and learning experience in PhD education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 639–662. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.59526
Lladó, A. P., Soley, L. F., Fraguell-Sansbelló, R. M., Pujolras, G. A., Planella, J. P., Roura-Pascuale, N., Martinez, J. J. S., & Montoro-Morenog, L. (2014). Student perceptions of peer assessment: An interdisciplinary study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 592–610. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.860077
Määttä, K. (Ed.). (2012). Obsessed with the doctoral theses. Supervision and support during the dissertation process. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Malfroy, J., & Yates, L. (2003). Knowledge in action: Doctoral programmes forging new identities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(2), 119–129. doi:10.1080/1360080032000122606
Manathunga, C. (2007). Supervision as mentoring: The role of power and boundary crossing. Studies in Continuing education, 29(2), 207–221. doi:10.1080/01580370701424650
McWilliam, E., Lawson, A., Evans, T., & Taylor, P. G. (2005). Silly, soft and otherwise suspect: Doctoral education as a risky business. Australian Journal of Education, 49(2), 214–227. doi:10.1177/000494410504900208
Mullins, G., & Kiley M. (2002). “It’s a phD, not a Nobel prize”: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 28(49), 369–386. doi:10.1080/0307507022000011507
Murray, L., & Lawrence, B. (2008). The basis of critique of practitioner-based enquiry. In L. Murray & B. Lawrence (Eds.), Practitioner-based enquiry: Principles for postgraduate research (pp. 18–41). London: Falmer Press.
Murray, R., & Moore, S. (2006). The handbook of academic writing. A fresh approach. New York, NY: Open University Press.
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2008). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language. A handbook for supervisors. London: Routledge.
Park, C. (2005). New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189–207. doi:10.1080/13600800500120018
Parry, S. (2007). Disciplines and doctorates. Dordrecht: Springer.
Philips, M., & Pugh, D. (2003). How to get a PhD. A handbook for students and their supervisors. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Rae, I. D. (2002). False start for the PhD in Australia. Historical Records of Australian Science, 14, 129–141. doi:10.1071/HR02009
Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85. doi:10.1177/1754073908097189
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination. Theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Assessing student learning responsibly: From history to an audacious proposal. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(1), 26–33. doi:10.3200/CHNG.39.1.26-33
Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2010). Feedback and self-regulated learning: Insights from supervisors’ and PhD examiners’ reports. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/14623940903525140
Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). Handbook for doctoral supervisors. London & New York, NY: Routledge.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. doi:10.2307/1556375
Tracy, K. (1997). Colloquium. Dilemmas of academic discourse. Advances in discourse processes 60. New Jersey, NJ: Ablex.
Uusiautti, S., & Määttä, K. (2011). Love for work as the way towards well-being. Global Journal of Human Social Science, 11(9), 63–68.
Watkins Jr., C. E., & Scaturo, D. J. (2014). Proposal for a common language, educationally-informed model of psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 34(6), 619–633. doi:10.1080/07351690.2014.924374
Whitelock, D., Faulkner, D., & Miell, D. (2008). Promoting creativity in PhD supervision: Tensions and dilemmas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 143–153. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.04.001
Willemyns, M., Gallois, C., & Callan, V. (2003). Trust me, I’m your boss: Trust and power in supervisor–supervisee communication. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 117–127. doi:10.1080/09585190210158547
Winter, R., Griffiths, M., & Green, K. (2000). The “Academic” qualities of practice: What are the criteria for a practice-based PhD? Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 25–37. doi:10.1080/030750700115993
Wisker, G., Robinson, G., Trafford, V., Warnes, M., & Creighton, E. (2003). From supervisory dialogues to successful PhDs: Strategies supporting and enabling the learning conversations of staff and students at postgraduate level. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(3), 383–397. doi:10.1080/1356251030900
Wright, T., & Cochrane, R. (2000). Factors influencing successful submission of PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 181–195. doi:10.1080/713696139
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Määttä, K. (2016). A Caring Supervisor. In: Uusiautti, S., Määttä, K. (eds) The Basics of Caring Research. Bold Visions in Educational Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-597-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-597-5_6
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-597-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)