Skip to main content

“Safe Injection and Needle Disposal Spaces for UBC! Now!” Collective Reflections on a Cellphilm Workshop

  • Chapter
What’s a Cellphilm?

Abstract

During the summer semester of 2015, our group of four graduate students participated in a visual research methodologies course organized by the Faculty of Education at the University of British Columbia (UBC). The class was led by Dr. Claudia Mitchell, a visiting scholar from McGill University (hereafter referred to as Claudia), and consisted of fourteen graduate students who met daily for a total of fourteen sessions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baumhardt, F., Lasage, R., Suarez, P., & Chadza, C. (2009). Farmers become filmmakers: Climate change adaptation in Malawi. In H. Reid, T. Cannon, R. Berger, M. Alam, A. Milligan, H. Ashley, & N. Kenton (Eds.), Participatory learning and action 60. Nottingham, UK: Russell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 37(4), 191–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, G. (2005). Using video for advocacy. In S. Gregory, G. Caldwell, R. Avni, & T. Harding (Eds.), Video for change: A guide for advocacy and activism (pp. 1–19). London, UK: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. (2014). Debating safe injecting sites in Vancouver’s inner city: Advocacy, conservatism and neoliberalism. Contemporary Drug Problems, 41, 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311. doi:10.1080/0141192042000195236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997). The politics of truth (S. Lotringer & L. Hochroth, Eds.). New York, NY: Semiotext(e). (Original work published 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, V., & Rasmussen, M. L. (2004). Studying schools with an “ethics of discomfort.” In B. Baker & K. Heyning (Eds.), Dangerous coagulations? The uses of Foucault in the study of education (pp. 305–321). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, L., Knippel, V., de Waal, D., & Nyamachumbe, F. (1999). Questions and answers about participatory video. Forests, Trees and People Newsletter, 40/41, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindon, S. (2003). Participatory video in geographic research: A feminist practice of looking? Area, 35(2), 142–153. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkness, V. J., & Barnhardt, R. (1991). First nations and higher education: The four R’s – respect, relevance, reciprocity, responsibility. Journal of American Indian Education, 30(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, H., Fink, J., Singh, N., & High, C. (2011). The politics of performance: methodological challenges of researching children’s experiences of childhood through the lens of participatory video. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 231–243. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.563622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEntee, K. (2015). Using cellphones in participatory visual research to address gender-based violence in and around rural South African schools: Reflections on research as intervention. Agenda, 29(3), 22–31. doi:10.1080/10130950.2015.1045339

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, M. (2006). Unwanted images: Tackling gender-based violence in South African school through youth artwork. In F. Leach & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Combating gender violence in and around schools (pp. 113–123). London, UK: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, M. (2011). The visual ethics of using children’s drawings in the documentary Unwanted Images. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith, & J. Stuart (Eds.), Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology (pp. 77–88). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mak, M. (2012). Visual postproduction in participatory video-making processes. In E.-J. Milne, C. Mitchell, & N. De Lange (Eds.), Handbook of participatory video (pp. 194–207). Plymouth, UK: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, M., Mitchell, C., & Stuart, J. (2004). Our photos, our videos, our stories [Video documentary]. Montreal, QC: Taffeta Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meth Project Foundation. (2015). View ads. Retrieved from http://www.methproject.org/ads/tv/

  • Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2011). Video and social action in rural South Africa. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 171–185). London, United Kingdom: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2013). What can a teacher do with a cellphone? Using participatory visual research to speak back in addressing HIV & AIDS. South African Journal of Education, 33(4), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moletsane, R., Mitchell, C., De Lange, N., Stuart, J., Buthelezi, T., & Taylor, M. (2009). What can a woman do with a camera? Turning the female gaze on poverty and HIV and AIDS in rural South Africa. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(3), 315–331. doi:10.1080/09518390902835454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, S. (2004). Critical multicultural education and students’ perspectives. In D. Gillborn & G. Ladson-Billings (Eds.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in multicultural education (pp. 179–200). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plush, T. (2009). Amplifying children’s voices on climate change: The role of participatory video. In H. Reid, T. Cannon, R. Berger, M. Alam, A. Milligan, H. Ashley, & N. Kenton (Eds.), Participatory learning and action 60 (pp. 119–128). Nottingham, UK: Russell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab-Cartas, J., & Mitchell, C. (2014). A tale of two sites: Cellphones, participatory video and indigeneity in community-based research. McGill Journal of Education, 49(3), 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siriwadhana, C. (2010). Windows of opportunity after a disaster: The case of Sri Lanka. Asian Bioethics Review, 2(2), 148–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver Coastal Health. (n.d.). Insite – supervised injection site. Retrieved from http://supervisedinjection.vch.ca/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chan, B., Chau, B., Ihnatovych, D., Schembri, N. (2016). “Safe Injection and Needle Disposal Spaces for UBC! Now!” Collective Reflections on a Cellphilm Workshop. In: MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., Schwab-Cartas, J. (eds) What’s a Cellphilm?. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_8

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-573-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics