Abstract
From 2011 to 2015, the Digital Economy Research Team (DERT), working with Prince Edward Island (PEI) teachers on a large scale new literacies project, developed a threshold concept map to describe the key literacies students and teachers would need to create effective content regardless of the medium, mode, or technology employed.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Biesta, G. (2012). Receiving the gift of teaching: From “learning from” to “being taught by.” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(5), 449–461.
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 30–35.
Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2008). Education, globalization and the future of the knowledge economy. European Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 131–156.
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Central issues in new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research in new literacies (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
Crook, C., & Bennett, L. (2007). Does using a computer disturb the organization of children’s writing? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(2), 313–321.
Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist society. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Dutro, E., Selland, M. K., & Bien, A. C. (2013). Revealing writing, concealing writers: High-stakes assessment in an urban elementary classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(2), 99–141. doi:10.1177/1086296X13475621
Gikas, J. (2011). Understanding change: Implementing MCDs in higher education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
Grant, K. (2015). From lists to images: Exploring the concept of the good teacher in teacher education. Journal of the Canadian Association of Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 1–23.
Herrington, A. (2009). Incorporating mobile technologies within constructivist-based curriculum resources. In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education (pp. 56–62). Wollongong, AU: University of Wollongong. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/
Irwin, R. L., & O’Donoghue, D. (2012). Encountering pedagogy through relational art practices. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 31(3), 221–236.
Irwin, R. L., Beer, R., Springgay, S., & Grauer, K. (2006). The rhizomatic relations of a/r/tography. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 70–88.
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., Jones, K., & Kress, G. (2009). Changing English? The impact of technology and policy on a school subject in the 21st century. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 8–20.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). NMC horizon report: 2012 K-12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://nmc.org/pdf/2012-horizon-report-K12.pdf
Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899–916.
Lazonick, W. (2003). The theory of the market economy and the social foundations of innovative enterprise. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(1), 9–44.
Lenheart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-Mobile-Phones.aspx
Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: A literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 210–226.
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (2008). Handbook of writing research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S., & Allan, G. (2008). The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software, 3(4), 51–61.
McKnight, D. (2006). The gift of curriculum method. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 8(1–2), 171–183.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. Cambridge, MS: MIT Press.
McManus, J. (2013). Selected haiku. Daily Haiku, 14. Retrieved from http://www.dailyhaiku.org/haiku/2013-march-01
Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., & The Deep-Play Research Group. (2013). A new approach to defining and measuring creativity. TechTrends, 57(5), 5–13.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923–949). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rodgers, C., & Scott, K. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions and changing contexts (pp. 732–755). New York, NY: Routledge.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172–194). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Senior, R. (2010). Connectivity: A framework for understanding effective language teaching in face-to-face and online learning communities. RELC Journal, 41(2) 137–147.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., Leggo, C., & Gouzouasis, P. (2008). Being with a/r/tography. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Wiebe, S. (2008). Resonation in writing. In S. Springgay, R. Irwin, C. Leggo, & P. Gouzouasis (Eds.), Being with a/r/tography (pp. 95–107). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Wiebe, S. (2010). A poet’s journey as a/r/togrpher: Teaching poetry to create a community of practice with junior high school students. Learning Landscapes, 4(1), 239–255.
Wiebe, S., & Altass, P. (in press). Multiliteracies threshold concepts: A guide for teachers. Charlottetown, PE: Island Studies Press.
Wiebe, S., & MacDonald, C. (2013). Passion and recognition in teacher’s work lives. In E. Lyle (Ed.), Bridging theory & practice: Pedagogical enactment for socially just education. Big Tancook Island, NS: Backalong Books.
Wiebe, S., & Morrison-Robinson, D. (2013). Becoming a/r/tographers while contesting rationalist discourses of work. Multi-Disciplinary Research in the Arts, 3(2), 1–18.
Wiebe, S., Sameshima, P., Irwin, R., Leggo, C., Grauer, K., & Gouzouasis, P. (2007). Re-imagining arts integration: Rhizomatic relations to the everyday. Journal of Educational Thought, 41(3), 263–280.
Wiebe, S., Gabriel, M. A., MacDonald, R. J., McAuley, A., & Moffatt, L. (2013, June). Utilizing a threshold space to teach writing in digital economy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, University of Victoria, British Columbia.
Wiebe, S., MacDonald, R., & Moffatt, L. (2014, May). A threshold concept heuristic for exploring student agency in literacy practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Brock University. St. Catharines, Ontario.
Wolsey, T. D., & Grisham, D. L. (2007). Adolescents and the new literacies: Writing engagement. Action in Teacher Education, 29(2), 29–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wiebe, S., Smith, C.C. (2016). Student A/R/Tographers Creating Cellphilms. In: MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., Schwab-Cartas, J. (eds) What’s a Cellphilm?. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_6
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-573-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)