Abstract
We introduced this book by describing our collaborative work at the first and second International Cellphilm Festivals at McGill University in Montreal, Canada and offering some impressions of the submissions we received each year. It seems fitting that while this volume went through the final stages of editing we celebrated the third International Cellphilm Festival.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cazden, C., Cope, B., Cook, J., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., Kalantzis, M., & Nakata, M. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 1, 60–92.
Dockney, J., & Tomaselli, K. G. (2009). Fit for the small(er) screen: Films, mobile TV and the new individual television experience. Journal of African Cinema, 1(1), 126–132.
England, K. V. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89.
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230.
Gumucio Dagron, A. (2001). Making waves: Stories of participatory communication for social change. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.
hooks, b., & Mesa-Bains, A. (2006). Homegrown: Engaged cultural criticism. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Huvila, I. (2008). Participatory archive: Towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science, 8(1), 15–36.
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, J. (2011). 1 million workers. 90 million iPhones. 17 suicides. Who’s to blame? Wired. http://www.wired.com/2011/02/ff_joelinchina/
Kamnqa, T. (2015). The #Hashtag show: Cellphilm revolution [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/CFMZQ1vNH-c
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, UK: Routledge.
Kwok, D., & Chen, K. (2016, January 10). Thousands protest in HK over missing publishers; booksellers worried. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-publisher-bookshops-idUSKCN0UO02A20160110
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2010). DIY Media: A contextual background and some contemporary themes. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), DIY media: Creating, sharing and learning with new technologies (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Margolis, E., & Pauwels, L. (Eds.). (2011). The sage handbook of visual research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Milne, E-J., Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2012). Handbook of participatory video. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2013). What can a teacher do with a cellphone? Using participatory visual research to speak back in addressing HIV & AIDS. SA Journal of Education, 33(4), 1–13.
Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2015). Interventions that address sexual violence against girls and young women: Mapping the issues. Agenda, 29(3), 3–12. doi:10.1080/10130950.2015.1070467
Mitchell, C., De Lange, N., & Moletsane, R. (2015). Me and my cellphone: Constructing change from the inside through cellphilms and participatory video in a rural community. Area, 1–7. doi:10.1111/area.12142
Park, E. G., Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2008). Social uses of digitisation within the context of HIV/AIDS: Metadata as engagement. Online Information Review, 32(6), 716–725.
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.
Pink, S. (2009). Visual interventions: Applied visual anthropology (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
Seay, L. (2012). What’s wrong with Dodd-Frank 1502? Conflict minerals, civilian livelihoods, and the unintended consequences of western advocacy. Retrieved from http://www.cgdev.org/files/1425843_file_Seay_Dodd_Frank_FINAL.pdf
Stahler-Sholk, R. (2000). A world in which many worlds fit: Zapatista responses to globalization (pp. 1–16). Paper presented at Latin American Studies Association, Miami, FL. Retrieved from http://lasa.international.pitt.edu/lasa2000/stahler-sholk.pdf
Taylor, D. (2012). Save as. Emiférica: On The Subject of Archives, 9(1–2), 1–19. Retrieved from http://hemisphericinstitute.org/hemi/fr/e-misferica-91/taylor
Walsh, S. (2014). Critiquing the politics of participatory video and the dangerous romance of liberalism. Area, 46(1), 2–7. doi:10.1111/area.12104
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schwab-Cartas, J., Macentee, K., Burkholder, C. (2016). Where do We Go from Here? A Conclusion. In: MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., Schwab-Cartas, J. (eds) What’s a Cellphilm?. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-573-9_13
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-573-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)