Skip to main content

Linking Research and Practice

Educational Design Research

  • Chapter
What is Next in Educational Research?

Abstract

This chapter describes how an Educational Design Research (EDR) approach was employed to design a context based professional development (PD) program tested in practice to support teacher educators to integrate ICT in their teaching of pre-service primary school mathematics teachers in Ethiopia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agyei, D., & Voogt, J. (2011). Determining teachers’ TPACK through observations and self-report data. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011, Nashville, TN, USA. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/36652

  • Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research a decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, H. (2006). From design research to large-scale impact: Engineering research in education. In J. Van Den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 121–150). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conceição, S., Sherry, L., & Gibson, D. (2004). Using developmental research to design, develop, and evaluate an urban education portal. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15(3), 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? A commentary on Collins, Joseph, and Bielaczyc; diSessa and Cobb; and Fishman, Marx, Blumenthal, Krajcik, and Soloway in the JLS Special Issue on Design-based Research. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getenet, S., & Beswick, K. (2013). Measuring mathematics teacher educators’ knowledge of technology integrated teaching: Instrument development. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne, July 7–11, pp. 354–361). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarainen, P. (2009). Designing and implementing a PBL course on educational digital video production: Lessons learned from a design-based research. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 57(2), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. E. (2006). Quality criteria for design research: Evidence and commitments. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 107–118). Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieveen, N. (2009). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 89–101). Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. British Medical Journal, 341(7783), 1147–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, E., & Reeves, T. C. (2010). The implications of the differences between design research and instructional systems design for educational technology researchers and practitioners. Educational Media International, 47(4), 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, T. (2009). Education design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 9–35). Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 96–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 42(2), 123–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thein, A. H., Barbas, P., Carnevali, C., Fox, A., Mahoney, A., & Vensel, S. (2012). The affordances of design-based research for studying multicultural literature instruction: Reflections and insights from a teacher-researcher collaboration. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(1), 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Introducing educational design research. In J. V. D. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 3–7). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. (2006). Toward productive design studies. In J. V. D. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 8–13). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Getenet, S.T., Beswick, K. (2016). Linking Research and Practice. In: Fan, S., Fielding-Wells, J. (eds) What is Next in Educational Research?. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-524-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-524-1_4

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-524-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics