Skip to main content

Turning Good Ideas into Quality Research

  • Chapter
What is Next in Educational Research?

Abstract

Often the good ideas and questions that beginning researchers wish to explore are influenced by extensive professional or personal experiences and well established views about the fields of study (Holbrook & Johnston, 1999). It is, therefore, important that subsequent educational research projects not only honour those views, to maintain motivation and interest, but also positions the views within a scholarly frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Applebee, A. N. (1987). Musings … Teachers and the process of research. Language Arts, 64(7), 714–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordage, G., & Dawson, B. (2003). Experimental study design and grant writing in eight steps and 28 questions. Medical Education, 37, 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callingham, R. A., & Watson, J. M. (2007, December 2–6). Overcoming research design issues using Rasch measurement: The StatSMART project. In P. L. Jeffrey (Ed.), Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education International Education Research Conference, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2007/cal07042.pdf

  • Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Firth-Cousins, J., & McKimm, J. (2012). What is educational research? Retrieved from http://www.faculty.londondeanery.ac.uk/e-learning/introduction-to-educational-research/html2pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzallen, N., & Brown, N. (2006, November 26–30). Evidence-based research in practice. In P. L. Jeffrey (Ed.), Engaging pedagogies. Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education 2006 International Education Research Conference, Adelaide. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2006/fit06585.pdf

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2003). Paradigmatic controversies, Contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 253–291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litchman, M. (2013). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2), 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London, UK: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, F. (2006). Normal and design sciences in education: Why both are necessary. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 19–44). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology enhanced environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (2007). Interpretive policy analysis. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopedia of governance (pp. 490–491). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412952613.n282

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fitzallen, N., Brown, N. (2016). Turning Good Ideas into Quality Research. In: Fan, S., Fielding-Wells, J. (eds) What is Next in Educational Research?. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-524-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-524-1_1

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-524-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics