Abstract
Mastering social science research methodology is a daunting challenge for doctoral candidates. This chapter explores these challenges by considering what comprises the essential threshold concepts of social science methodology. Particular attention is given in this discussion to the doctoral dissertation phase of learning and the critical role of supervision. Underlying this research are the ongoing efforts to improve instruction in research methodology and to increase successful completion rates for doctoral candidates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bogard, T., Liu, M., & Chiang, Y. V. (2013). Thresholds of knowledge development in complex problem solving: A multiple-case study of advanced learners’ cognitive processes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 465–503.
Bourke, S., Holbrook, A., Lovat, T., & Farley, P. (2004). Attrition, completion and completion times of PhD candidates. Paper presented at the meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, AU.
Deegan, M. J., & Hill, M. R. (1991). Doctoral dissertations as liminal journeys of the self: Betwixt and between in graduate sociology programs. Teaching Sociology, 19(3), 322–332.
Entwistle, N. (2005). Learning outcomes and ways of thinking across contrasting disciplines and settings in higher education. Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 67–82.
Gardner, S. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experience of doctoral students in high- and lowcompleting departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journalof Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81.
Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., Jones, L., & Walker, G. E. (2006). Apprenticeship and intellectual community: Lessons from the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate. In Conference proceedings of the National Conference on Doctoral Education and the Faculty of the Future. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Grasso, M., Barry, M., & Valentine, T. (2009). A data-driven approach to improving doctoral completion (Occasional Paper). Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.
Group of Eight. (2013, March). The changing PhD (Discussion Paper). Turner, ACT, Australia: Author.
Humphrey, R., & Simpson, B. (2012). Writes of passage: Writing up qualitative data as a threshold concept in doctoral research. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 735–746.
Irvine, N., & Carmichael, P. (2009). Threshold concepts: A point of focus for practitioner research. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 103–119.
Kaczynski, D., Salmona, M., & Smith, T. (2014). Qualitative research in finance. Australian Journal of Management, 39(1), 127–135.
Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2008). The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 507–514.
Keefer, J. M. (2015). Experiencing doctoral liminality as a conceptual threshold and how supervisors can use it. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 17–28.
Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 293–304.
Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 431–441.
Land, R., Rattray, J., & Vivian, P. (2014). A closer look at liminality: Incorrigibles and threshold capital. Proceedings of the National Academy’s Sixth Annual Conference and the Fourth Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference, Ireland.
Lovitts, B. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t, and why. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 296–325.
Melles, G. (2009). Global perspectives on structured research training in doctorates of design – what do we value? Design Studies, 30(3), 255–271.
Meyer, J. H. F. (2012). Variation in student learning as a threshold concept. Journal of Faculty Development, 26(3), 8–13.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving student learning theory and practice – Ten years on. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388.
Moss, P. A., Phillips, D. C., Erickson, F. D., Floden, R. E., Lather, P. A., & Schneider, B. L. (2009). Learning from our differences: A dialogue across perspectives on quality in education research. Educational Researcher, 38(7), 501–517.
Salmona, M., Kaczynski, D., & Smith, T. (2015). Qualitative theory in finance: Theory into practice. Australian Journal of Management, 40(3), 403–413.
Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 305–316.
von Strumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 574–588.
Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ward, M. H. (2013). Living in liminal space: The PhD as accidental pedagogy (Doctoral Thesis). University of Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/9397
Wisker, G. (2015). Developing doctoral authors: Engaging with theoretical perspectives through the literature review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 64–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salmona, M., Kaczynski, D., Wood, L.N. (2016). The Importance of Liminal Space for Doctoral Success. In: Land, R., Meyer, J.H.F., Flanagan, M.T. (eds) Threshold Concepts in Practice. Educational Futures. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-512-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-512-8_12
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-512-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)