Skip to main content

The Role of Domains in the Conceptualization of Talent

  • Chapter
Giftedness and Talent in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Advances in Creativity and Giftedness ((ACAG,volume 10))

Abstract

In this chapter we present research concerning important aspects of domain specific giftedness. Specifically, we address the evidence regarding the relationship between specific abilities and achievement. Empirical evidence suggests that specific abilities have been used widely and validly for identification of exceptional talent in performance domains, and mathematical and spatial reasoning ability have demonstrated predictive validity for achievement in STEM domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aud, S., Fox, M., & KewalRamani, A. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups (NCES 2010-015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badian, N. A. (2001). Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 179–202. doi:10.1007/s11881-001-0010-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. J. (Ed.). (1985a). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1982b). The role of gifts and markers in the development of talent. Exceptional Children, 48, 510–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, T. L., & Coleman, L. (2005). School-based conceptions of giftedness, In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 52–63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1986). Culture, time and the development of talent. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 264–284). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Tsukayama, E., Berstein, H., & Ericsson, K. A. (2011). Deliberate practice spells success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 174–181. doi:10.1177/1948550610385872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Visscher, C., Lemmink, K. A. P. M., & Mulder, T. (2007). Multidimensional performance characteristics and standard of performance in talented youth field hockey players: A longitudinal study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 481–489. doi:10.1080/02640410600719945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Kannekens, R., Lyons, J., Tromp, Y., & Visscher, C. (2010). Knowing what to do and doing it: Differences in self-assessed tactical skills of regional, sub-elite, and elite youth field hockey players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 521–528. doi:10.1080/02640410903582743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. Th., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1986). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (Ed.). (1994). Beyond universals in cognitive development (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (2000). Children’s talent in fine art and music. Roeper Review, 22, 98–101. doi:10.1080/02783190009554010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The science and politics of intelligence in gifted education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 24–40). New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulslander, J., Olson, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Wadsworth, S. J. (2010). Longitudinal stability of reading-related skills and their prediction of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 111–136. doi:10.1080/10888431003604058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Webb, R. M., & Bleske-Rechek, A. (2006). Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychological Science, 17, 194–199. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01685.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malina, R. M. (2010). Early sport specialization: Roots, effectiveness, risks. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 9, 364–371. doi:10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181fe3166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolese, S. K., & Kline, R. B. (1999). Prediction of basic reading skills among young children with diverse linguistic backgrounds. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement [Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science], 31, 209–216. doi:10.1037/h0087089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morelock, M. J., & Geldman, D. H. (2003). Extreme precocity: Prodigies, savants and children of extraordinarily high IQ. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 454–469). New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., … Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67, 130–159. doi:10.1037/a0026699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochse, R. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2000). The transition from childhood giftedness to adult creative productiveness: Psychological characteristics and social supports. Roeper Review, 23, 65–71. doi:10.1080/02783190009554068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02007.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957–961. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02182.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1998). Understanding those who create (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyryt, M. C. (1999). Effectiveness of training children’s divergent thinking: A meta-analytic review. In A. S Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth (pp. 351–366). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness. A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246–279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthsatz, J., Detterman, D., Griscom, W. S., & Cirullo, B. A. (2008). Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice. Intelligence, 36, 330–338. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shatil, E., & Share, D. L. (2003). Cognitive antecedents of early reading ability: A test of the modularity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 1–31. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00106-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829–840. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1991). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829–840. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1992a). Leaders of American psychology, 1879–1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5–17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1992b). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452–463. doi:10.1177/0146167292184009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1998). Achieved eminence in minority and majority cultures: Convergence versus divergence in the assessments of 294 African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 805–817. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidimensional multiplicative, and dynamic process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 39–43. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creative life cycles in literature: Poets versus novelists or conceptualists versus experimentalists? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 1, 133–139. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.1.3.133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12, 28–46. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity in highly eminent individuals. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 174–188). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K., & Song, A. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain: Cox’s 282 geniuses revisited. Psychological Science, 20, 429–434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02313.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 11–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X027003011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Giftedness as developing expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved knowledge. High Ability Studies, 12, 159–179. doi:10.1080/13598130120084311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2003). WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 14, 109–137. doi:10.1080/1359813032000163807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327–342). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F. (2000). Developing young adolescent performers at Julliard: An educational prototype for elite level talent development in the arts and sciences. In C. F. Van Lieshout & P. G. Heymans (Eds.), Talent, resilience, and wisdom across the lifespan (pp. 249–276). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343–357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. (3rd ed., pp. 45–59). New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 484–492. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, C., Barnes-Burroughs, K., Andrianopoulos, M., & Carr, M. (2003). Potential factors related to untrained singing talent: A survey of singing pedagogues. Journal of Voice, 17, 298–307. doi:10.1067/S0892-1997(03)00068-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Subotnik, R. F. (2012). Important issues, some rhetoric, and a few straw men: A response to comments on “Rethinking giftedness and gifted education.” Gifted Child Quarterly. 56, 224–231. doi:10.1177/0016986212456080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zifcak, M. (1981). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 117–126. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(81)90040-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R.F., Worrell, F.C. (2016). The Role of Domains in the Conceptualization of Talent. In: Ambrose, D., Sternberg, R.J. (eds) Giftedness and Talent in the 21st Century. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness, vol 10. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-503-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-503-6_5

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-503-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics