Abstract
The inspiration for this study came from my experience working on a project with the Far West Laboratory in San Francisco. The project was called Portraits of Intermediate Life Science Classes (Lash et al., 1984) and was part of their Secondary Science and Mathematics Improvement Program. The goal of the project was to document how eleven 7th grade life science teachers in California and Utah taught science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becker, J. (1981). Differential treatment of females and males in mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12 (1), 40-53.
Bossert, S. (1981). Understanding sex differences in children’s classroom experiences. The Elementary School Journal, 81 (5), 256-266.
Brophy, J. (1985). Interactions of male and female students with male and female teachers. In L. Wilkinson and C. Marrett (Eds.). Gender Influences in Classroom Interactions (pp. 115-142). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Brophy, J. & Good, T. (1970a). Teachers’ communication of differential expectations of children’s classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365-374.
Brophy, J. & Good, T. (1970b). The brophy-good dyadic interaction system in A. Simon & E. Boyer (Eds.), Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of observational instruments continued. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
Brophy, J. & Good, T. (1974). Teacher student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Cooper, H. & Good, T. (1983). Pygmalion grows up: Studies in the expectation communication process. New York: Longman.
Eccles, J. & Blumenfeld, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter? In L. Wilkinson and C. Marrett (Eds.). Gender influences in classroom interactions (pp. 79-114). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Fennema, E., Reyes, L., Perl, T., Konsin, M., & Drakenberg M. (1980, April). Cognitive and affective influences on the development of sex related differences in mathematics. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Fox, L. (1979). The effects of sex role socialization on mathematics participation and achievement. Washington, DC: Career Awareness Division, National institute of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Getzels, J. & Thelen, H. (1960). The classroom as a unique social system. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 59, 53-81.
Good, T. & Brophy, J. (1984). Looking in classrooms. New York: Harper and Row.
Hall, R. & Sandler, B. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Project on the status and Education of Women, Washington, DC: Association of American colleges.
Hillman, S. & Davenport, G. (1978). Teacher student interaction in desegregated schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 545-553.
Kahle, J. (1985). Retention of girls in science: Case studies of secondary science teachers. In J. Kahle (Ed.), Women in Science (pp. 49-76). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A., & Engel, M. (1979). Learning what’s taught: Sex differences in instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 432-439.
McDermott, M. (1983, April). Impact of classroom interaction patterns on students’ achievement related beliefs and behaviors. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Detroit, MI.
Morse, L. & Handley, H. (1985). Listening to adolescents: Gender differences in science classroom interactions. In L. Wilkinson & C. Marrett (Eds.), Gender Influences in Classroom Interaction (pp. 37-56). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Parsons, J., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J. & Midgley, C. (1980). Self-perceptions, task perceptions and academic choice: Origins and change (FinalReport, Grant NIE-G- 788-0022). Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.Ed 186 477).
Skolnick, J., Langbort, C., & Day, L. (1982). How to encourage girls in math and science, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Stallings, J. (1979). Factors influencing women to enroll in advanced mathematics courses: Executive summary (Final Report Grant NIE-G-78 0024). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Whyte, J. (1984). Observing sex stereotypes and interactions in the school lab and workshop. Educational Review, 36 (1), 75-86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, D.R. (2016). Sex Differences in Classroom Interactions in Secondary Science. In: Understanding Girls. Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-497-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-497-8_3
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-497-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)