Skip to main content

Evidence-Driven Policy and Practice in Education

Issues of Veracity in Quantitatively Based Research

  • Chapter
The Best Available Evidence

Abstract

For several decades, calls have been made by a variety of researchers and practitioners for basing decisions in educational policy and practice in evidence rather than on more traditional and common approaches grounded in personal political ideology or personal preference and preconceived notions drawing on unsystematic analysis of anecdotal data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Association for Psychological Science. (2015). Submission guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/journals/psychological_science/ps-submissions

  • Association for Psychological Science. (n.d.). Manuscript structure, style, and content guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/journals/ms-structureguidelines

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. New York, NY: Rand McNally & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Rand McNally & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. M. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, F. (2010). The American psychological association publication manual sixth edition: Implications for statistics education. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society (Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved from www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications.php

  • Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Toronto: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Toronto: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, A., & Donald, A. (1998). Looking forward: Making better use of research findings. British Medical Journal, 317(7150), 72–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, K. D., Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, B. R. (1995). Basic statistics for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J., & Pearson E. S. (1933). The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 29, 492–510. doi:10.1017/S030500410001152X

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1972). The logic of scientific discover. London: Hutchinson & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage Publications. (n.d.). Sage journals psychological science. Retrieved from http://pss.sagepub.com/

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2006). Policy drivers in UK higher education in historical perspective: “Inside out,” “outside in” and the contribution of research. Higher Education Quarterly, 60(2), 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprinthall, R. C. (2011). Basic statistical analysis (9th ed.). Toronto: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (2003). In praise of weakness: Chartering, the University of the United States, and Darmouth College. Higher Education Policy, 16(1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Costa, J.D. (2016). Evidence-Driven Policy and Practice in Education. In: Newton, P., Burgess, D. (eds) The Best Available Evidence. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-438-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-438-1_1

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-438-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics