Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning as a Hybrid

Educational Engagement in the Digital Age

  • Chapter
Learning across Contexts in the Knowledge Society

Part of the book series: The Knowledge Economy and Education ((KNOW))

Abstract

Lately, examinations of the discrepancies between learning in school and out-ofschool settings have been enriched by discourses that address the changing role of digital technologies and media in shaping ways in which young people engage, learn, and build their identities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 82(4), 132–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2004). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloome, D., & Clark, C. (2006). Discourse-in-use. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 227–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Shuttling between discourses: Textual and pedagogical possibilities for periphery scholars. In G. Cortese & A. Duszak (Eds.), Identity, community, discourse: English in intercultural settings (pp. 47–68). Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. (2002). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–313. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Culture in mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcolm, J. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: A report for the learning and skills research centre. Leeds, England: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A., & Wegerif, R. (2006). Founding editors editorial: Thinking skills and creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 339–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O., & Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Digital disconnect? The ‘digital learner’ and the school. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community and learning lives in the digital age (pp. 87–106). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures. Education, technology and social change. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (2009). Wordle. Retrieved from http://www.wordle.net/

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London, England: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2000). Teenagers in new times: A new literacy studies perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(5), 412–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2010). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the thirdspace. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Jewson, N., & Unwin, L. (Eds.). (2007). Communities of practice: Critical perspectives. Abingdon, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D., Lee, S.-S., & Lim, K. Y. T. (2012). Authenticity in learning for the 21st century: Bridging the formal and the informal. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60(6), 1071–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K.,…Watkins, S. G. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, C. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpulainen, K., & Mikkola, A. (2014). Boundary crossing of discourses in chat interaction during creative collaborative writing. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(1), 43–53. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.12.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpulainen, K., & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9(5), 449–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpulainen, K., & Renshaw, P. (2007). Cultures of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3–4), 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpulainen, K., Mikkola, A., & Jaatinen, A.-M. (2013). The chronotopes of technology-mediated creative learning practices in an elementary school community. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 53–74. doi:10.1080/17439884.2012.752383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantz-Andersson, A., Vigmo, S., & Bowen, R. (2013). Crossing boundaries in Facebook: Students’ framing of language learning activities as extended spaces. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigsen, S. R., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I., & Säljö, R. (Eds.). (2010). Introduction. Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work.’ Learning Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J., & Yates, L. (2006). Making modern lives: Subjectivity, schooling and social change. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschkovich, J. N. (1996). Moving up and getting steeper: Negotiating shared descriptions of linear graphs. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 239–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D., & Oblinge, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps towards understanding the net generation. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsten, A.-C., & Säljö, R. (2012). Communities, boundary practices and incentives for knowledge sharing? A study of the deployment of a digital control system in a process industry as a learning activity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rex, L., Steadman, S., & Graciano, M. (2006). Researching the complexity of classroom interaction. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods of research in education (3rd ed., pp. 727–772). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schubauer-Leoni, M. L., & Grossen, M. (1993). Negotiating the meaning of questions in didactic and experimental contracts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(4), 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (2006). How can we address the conflicts between personal informal learning and traditional classroom education? In M. Sharples (Ed.), Big issues in mobile learning (pp. 21–24). Nottingham, England: Nottingham University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 471–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vass, E., & Littleton, K. (2010). Peer collaboration and learning in the classroom. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 105–136). Bingley, England: Emerald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D., & Nocon, H. (2007). Boundary-crossing competence: Theoretical considerations and educational design. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14(3), 178–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger. E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, Finland

    Anna Mikkola

  2. Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, Finland

    Kristiina Kumpulainen

Authors
  1. Anna Mikkola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristiina Kumpulainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, University of Oslo, Norway

    Ola Erstad

  2. Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, Finland

    Kristiina Kumpulainen

  3. Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

    Åsa Mäkitalo

  4. Department of Communication, Business and Information Technologies, Roskilde University, Denmark

    Kim Christian Schrøder

  5. Institute of Social Studies, University of Tartu, Estonia

    Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt

  6. School of Education, University of Iceland, Iceland

    Thuridur Jóhannsdóttir

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mikkola, A., Kumpulainen, K. (2016). Learning as a Hybrid. In: Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, Å., Schrøder, K.C., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., Jóhannsdóttir, T. (eds) Learning across Contexts in the Knowledge Society. The Knowledge Economy and Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-414-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-414-5_9

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-414-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation