Skip to main content

The Dangers of having Fun – Doing Production Work in School

Tensions in Teachers’ Repertoires on Media Education

  • Chapter
Learning across Contexts in the Knowledge Society

Part of the book series: The Knowledge Economy and Education ((KNOW))

Abstract

The role and status of practical versus theoretical knowledge and informal versus school-based education have been the main themes of media education research since the last century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Buckingham, D. (1995). Media education and the media industries: Bridging the gaps? Journal of Educational Television, 21(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (1998). Media education in the UK: Moving beyond protectionism. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2007a). Beyond technology: Children’s learning in the age of digital culture. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2007b). Media education goes digital: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2010). Do we really need media education 2.0? Teaching in the age of participatory media. In K. Drotner & K. C. Schrøder (Eds.), Digital content creation: Perceptions, practices, & perspectives (Vol. 46, pp. 287). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burn, A., & Durran, J. (2006). Digital anatomies: Analysis as production in media education. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations: Children, young people and new media (pp. 273–293). London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, I., & Hurd, G. (1988). Higher education, training and the cultural industries: A working partnership. Paper presented at the Third International Television Studies Conference, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0 for schools: Social participation and learning. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, T., & Lund, A. (2008). Digital tools and instructional rules: A study of how digital technologies become rooted in classroom procedures. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 10(2), 36–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). California, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drotner, K. (1991). At skabe sig – selv: ungdom, æstetik, pædagogik (To create – yourself: Youth, aesthetics, pedagogy). København, Danmark: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edley, N. (2001). Conversation analysis, discursive psychology and the study of ideology: A response to Susan Speer. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1), 136–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O. (1997). Mediebruk og medieundervisning (Media use and Media education). IMK-rapport no. 32. (Published PhD dissertation), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O. (2010). Media literacy and education: The past, present and future. In S. Kotilainen & S.-B. Arnolds-Granlund (Eds.), Media literacy education: Nordic perspectives (pp. 15–27). Gothenburg, Sweden: NORDICOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O., & Amdam, S. (2013). From protection to public participation. A review of research literature on media literacy. Javnost-The Public, 20(2), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O., & Gilje, Ø. (2008). Regaining impact. Media education and media literacy in a Norwegian context. Nordicom Review: Nordic research on media & communication, 29(2), 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O., Amdam, S., Arnseth, H. C., & Silseth, K. (2014). Om fremtidens kompetansebehov. En systematisk gjennomgang av internasjonale og nasjonale initiativ (On the future need for competences. A systematic review of international and national initiatives) Rapport til Ludvigsen-utvalget, Oslo, Norway: UiO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., & de Lange, T. (2007). Re-mixing multimodal resources: Multiliteracies and digital production in Norwegian media education. Learning, media and Technology, 32(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9–20). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1974). The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences. London, England: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003). The discourse on language. In L. Bruke, T. Crowley, & A. Girvin (Eds.), The Routledge language and cultural theory reader (pp. 231–240). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilje, Ø. (2002). Nye medier – nye mål: Om hvordan mediekompetanse som mediepedagogisk siktemål kan legitimeres i skolen (New media – New goals: On how media competence can be made legitimate in school) (Master thesis).University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilje, Ø. (2011). Working in tandem with editing tools: Iterative meaning-making in filmmaking practices. Visual Communication, 10(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. F. (1993). School subjects and curriculum change: Studies in curriculum history (Anniversary ed., Vol. 20). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. E., MacGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of twenty-first century skills. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hølleland, H. (2007). På vei mot Kunnskapsløftet: begrunnelser, løsninger og utfordringer (On the road towards the knowledge promotion reform; reasons, solutions and challenges). Oslo, Norway: Cappelen akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itō, M. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., & Purushotma, R. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimarkon, P., & Todd, R. W. (2011). Using quantitative methods as a framework for qualitative analyses. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference: Doing Research in Applied Linguistics, King Monkurt’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, H. (2011). Thematic analysis. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kist, W. (2005). New literacies in action: Teaching and learning in multiple media. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotilainen, S., & Arnolds-Granlund, S.-B. (2010). Media literacy education: Nordic perspectives. Gothenburg, Sweden: NORDICOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. California, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavis, F., & Thompson, D. (1933). Culture and environment: The training of critical awareness. London, England: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 448–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterman, L. (1998). Foreword: The media education revolution. In A. Hart (Ed.), Teaching the media: International perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A., & Grace, W. (1993). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2012–2013). Stortingsmelding 20 – På rett vei. Kvalitet og mangfold i fellesskolen (White paper 20 – On the right track. Quality and diversity in public school). Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Østerud, S. (2007). Krever medieutviklingen en ny dannelsestenkning? (Does the media development require a rethink of bildung?) In S. Vettenranta & O. Erstad (Eds.), Mediedanning og mediepedagogikk. Fra digital begeistring til kritisk dømmekraft (pp. 34–61). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quin, R. (2003a). A genealogy of media studies. The Australian Educational Researcher, 30(1), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quin, R. (2003b). Questions of knowledge in Australian media education. Television & New Media, 4 (Nov. 2003), 439–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, R. (1990). Media studies or Manpower services? Screen, 24(3), 74–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigbrand, K. (1989). Mediekunskap i skolan: en studie av massmedieundervisningens ABC (Media education in school; A study in the ABC of media teaching) (Dissertation). Stockholms universitet, Pedagogiske institutionen, Stockholms, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thavenius, J. (1995). Den motsägelsefulla bildningen (The contradictory bildung). Stockholm, Sweden: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag Symposion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, B. (1998). Medieanalyse – at lære om og med medier (Media Analysis – To learn about and with media). KvaN, 50, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, B. (2007). TV på tavlen: På ny (Television on the blackboard: Again). Copenhagen, Denmark: CVU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tønnessen, E. S. (2002). Media education in Norway. In A. Hart & D. Süss (Eds.), Media education in 12 European countries. A comparative study of teaching media in mother tongue education in secondary schools (pp. 88–99). Zurich, Switzerland: Euromedia Project/Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vettenranta, S. (2004). Mediepedagogikk: fra instrumenthåndtering til kritisk borgerskap (Media pedagogy: From handling instruments to critical citizenship). Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vettenranta, S., & Erstad, O. (2007). Mediedanning og mediepedagogikk: fra digital begeistring til kritisk dømmekraft (Media bildung and media pedagogy: From digital enthusiasm to critical judgement). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vibe, N., Frøseth, M. W., Hovdhaugen, E., & Markussen, E. (2012). Strukturer og konjunkturer: evaluering av Kunnskapsløftet: sluttrapport fra prosjektet “Tilbudsstruktur, gjennomføring og kompetanse oppnåelse i videregående opplæring” (Structures and conjunctions: An evaluation of the Knowledge Promotion reform) (Vol. 26/2012). Oslo, Norway: NIFU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1988). Discourse Analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 168–183). London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whannel, P., & Hall, S. (1965). The popular arts. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London, England: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amdam, S.H. (2016). The Dangers of having Fun – Doing Production Work in School. In: Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, Å., Schrøder, K.C., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., Jóhannsdóttir, T. (eds) Learning across Contexts in the Knowledge Society. The Knowledge Economy and Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-414-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-414-5_5

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-414-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics