Abstract
The dramatic expansion of knowledge during recent decades, as well as the rapid development of digital technologies providing access to information, poses interesting challenges to established educational activities, including attempts to introduce young people to modern scientific practices and their results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(1), 26–55.
Berry, A., Mulhall, P., Loughran, J. J., & Gunstone, R. F. (1999). Helping students learn from laboratory work. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 45(1), 27–31.
Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. v. Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching science (pp. 20–46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
DeBoer, G. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
Driver, R., Newton, O., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London, England: Methuen.
Gyllenpalm, J. (2010). Teachers’ language of inquiry: The conflation between methods of teaching and scientific inquiry in science education. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Stockholm University.
Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655–675.
Lager-Nyqvist, L., Wickman, P.-O., Lundegård, I., Lederman, J. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2011). Vad lär sig och minns elever om att göra naturvetenskapliga undersökningar? Att bedöma begreppsligt vetande och praktiskt kunnande [What do students learn and remember about doing investigations in natural science. Evaluating conceptual insight and practical knowing]. In R. Säljö (Ed.), Lärande och minnande som social praktik [Learning and remembering as social practice] (pp. 108–127). Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lemke, J. L. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 33–47). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
Lundqvist, E., Säljö, R., & Östman, L. (2013). Scientific literacy. Teori och praktik. Malmö, Sweden: Gleerups.
Mayer, V. J. (Ed.). (2002). Global science literacy. Dodrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Petersson, E., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Säljö, R. (2013). Exploring nature through virtual experimentation. Picking up concepts and modes of reasoning in regular classroom practices. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 3(8), 139–156.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Säljö, R. (2009). Learning, theories of learning, and unit of analysis in research. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 202–208.
Säljö, R. (2011). Learning in a sociocultural perspective. In V. Grøver Aukrust (Ed.), Learning and cognition in education (pp. 59–63). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493–516.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88(3), 325–344.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edstrand, E., Lantz-Andersson, A., Säljö, R., Mäkitalo, Å. (2016). Deciphering the Anatomy of Scientific Argumentation. In: Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, Å., Schrøder, K.C., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., Jóhannsdóttir, T. (eds) Learning across Contexts in the Knowledge Society. The Knowledge Economy and Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-414-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-414-5_3
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-414-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)