Abstract
Developments within the “knowledge society,” especially those resulting from technological innovation, have intensified an interest in the relationship between different contexts and multiple sites of learning across what is often termed as formal, non-formal and informal learning environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 101–139.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. I). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Castells, M., & Himanen, P. (2004). The information society and the welfare state: The Finnish model. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Castor, T., & Cooren, F. (2006). Organizations as hybrid forms of life: The implications of the selection of agency in problem formulation. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 570–600.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11, 373–393.
Credé, A., & Mansell, R. (1998). Knowledge societies…in a nutshell. Information technology for sustainable development. Report for the UN Commission on Science and Technology for Development and the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (Eds.). (2010). The nature of learning. Using research to inspire practice. Paris, France: OECD.
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, R., Biesta, G., & Thorpe, M. (Eds.). (2009). Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching. Communities, activities and networks. London, England: Routledge.
Engeström, Y., & Tuomi-Gröhn, T. (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon.
Erstad, O. (2010). Digital kompetanse i skolen. Andre utgave [Digital literacy in the school. Second edition]. Oslo, Norway: University Press.
Erstad, O., & Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Digital disconnect? The “digital learner” and the school. In O. Erstad & J. Sefton-Green (Eds.), Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Falzon, M.-A. (2009). Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
Fisher-Yoshida, B., Geller, K. D., & Shapiro, S. A. (Eds.). (2009). Innovations in transformative learning. Space, culture, & the arts. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Gilje, Ø., & Erstad, O. (2014). Tracing learning across contexts. Methodological challenges and ethical considerations. In G. B. Gudmundsdottir & K. B. Vasbø (Eds.), Methodological challenges when exploring digital learning spaces in education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Hamilton, D., & Zufiaurre, B. (2014). Blackboards and bootstraps. Revisioning education and schooling. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense publishers.
Hardy, C. (2004). Scaling up and bearing down in discourse analysis: Questions regarding textual agencies and their context. Organization, 11, 415–425.
Hepp, A. (2013). The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the “mediation of everything.” European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 615–629.
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. London, England: Routledge.
Hull, G., & Greeno, J. G. (2006). Identity and agency in nonschool and school worlds. In Z. Bekerman, N. C. Burbules, & D. Silberman-Keller (Eds.), Learning in places. The informal education reader (pp. 77–98). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Kumpulainen, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2014). What is connected learning and how to research it? International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(2), 7–18.
Leander, K., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34, 329–394.
Learning from experience trust. (2000). Informal learning. Report on a search conference, London, England. Retrieved from http://climbingthewall.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/LET-Final-Report-Informal-Learning-Oct-2000-copy.pdf on June 11th 2015
Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of everyday life (Vol. 1). London, England: Verso.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Olafsson, K. (2011). EU kids online: Final report. EU Kids Online, London School of Economics & Political Science, London, England. Retrived June 11, 2015, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39351/1/EU_kids_online_final_report_%5BLSERO%5D.pdf
Livingstone, D. W., & Guile, D. (2012). The knowledge economy and lifelong learning. A critical reader. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
Mattelart, A. (2003). The information society. An introduction. London, England: Sage.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–115). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
So, H.-J., Kim, I., & Looi, C.-K. (2008). Seamless mobile learning: Possibilities and challenges arising from the Singapore experience. Educational Technology International, 9(2), 97–121.
Soja, E. W. (1989). Post modern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London, England: Verso Books.
Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (Vols. I, II, pp. 37–54). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
The monitoring and reporting group. (2007). Mapping the field. A framework for measuring, monitoring and reporting on adult learning in Canada. Ottawa, Canada: Adult Learning Knowledge Centre, Canadian Council on Learning. Retrieved from http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/AdLKC/Reports07/MappingtheFieldJune18EN.pdf on June 11th 2015.
UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. UNESCO World Report. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Wertsch, J., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning. Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 336–356). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, Å., Schrøder, K.C., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., Jóhannsdóttir, T. (2016). Tracing Learning Experiences Within and Across Contexts. In: Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, Å., Schrøder, K.C., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., Jóhannsdóttir, T. (eds) Learning across Contexts in the Knowledge Society. The Knowledge Economy and Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-414-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-414-5_1
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-414-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)