Skip to main content

Subject to Interpretation

Autoethnography and the Ethics of Writing about the Embodied Self

  • Chapter

Abstract

Autoethnography taught me a great deal about my embodied experience of chronic kidney disease, research as an embodied act, and my stance as a researcher. As a methodology, it has long proven useful for a variety of research fields, not the least education (Hayler, 2011; Sparkes, 1996; Starr, 2010). In South Africa, autoethnography has been used to interpret experiences in the changing landscape of higher education (Grossi, 2006; Harrison, 2009) because it offers researchers a number of possibilities concerning identity and transformation work, including problematising traditional categorisations and old hierarchies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, P. (2006). Rescuing autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 400–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgens, R. (2007). Autoethnography and untold stories. Qualitative Researcher, 4, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, A. S. (2008). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. Tesol Quarterly, 46(2), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2012). Collaborative autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (1992). Memories of breathing: A phenomenological dialogue: Asthma as a way of becoming. In J. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative health research (pp. 123–140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crites, S. (1971). The narrative quality of experience. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 39(3), 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley-Matoka, M. (2005). Desperately seeking normal: The promise and perils of living with kidney transplantation. Social Science and Medicine, 61(4), 821–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S. (2007). Arguments against auto-ethnography. Qualitative Researcher, 4, 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denshire, S. (2014). On auto-ethnography. Current Sociology Review, 62(6), 831–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2009). Qualitative inquiry under fire: Toward a new paradigm dialogue. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2013). Interpretive autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellefsen, E. (2013). The Health-within-Illness Model (HWIM) to reconcile borderlands between health and illness for people living with chronic disease. In R. Richards & J. Creek (Eds.), Chronicity, care and complexity (pp. 41–52). Oxford, England: Inter-Disciplinary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (1995). Final negotiations: A story of love, loss, and chronic illness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettorre, E. (2005). Gender, older female bodies and autoethnography: Finding my feminist voice by telling my illness story. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28, 535–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, T. H. (2007). College students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding organ donation: An integrated review of the literature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 243–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (2006). Powerlessness and social interpretation. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 3(1–2), 96–108. doi:10.1353/epi.0.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glissant, E. (2002). Conclusion: The unforeseeable diversity of the world. In E. Mudimbe-Boyi (Ed.), Beyond dichotomies: Histories, identities, cultures and the challenge of globalization (pp. 287–296). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, H. L. (2008). Writing qualitative inquiry: Self, stories and academic life. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, E. T. (2006). An ordinary teacher: An autoethnography (Doctoral dissertation). University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Retrieved from http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10413/1343/Grossi_Edwina_Theresa_2006.pdf?sequence=1

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. (2009). A tinker’s quest: Embarking on an autoethnographic journey in learning “doctoralness.” In K. Pithouse, C. Mitchell, & R. Moletsane (Eds.), Making connections: Self-study and social action (pp. 253–267). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayler, M. (2011). Autoethnography, self-narrative and teacher education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordens, C. F. C., Little, M., Paul, K., & Sayers, E-J. (2001). Life disruption and generic complexity: A social linguistic analysis of narratives of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1227–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudimbe-Boyi, E. (2002). Preface. In E. Mudimbe-Boyi (Ed.), Beyond dichotomies: Histories, identities, cultures and the challenge of globalization (pp. ix–xxv). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncey, T. (2005). Doing autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykhalovskiy, E. (1996). Reconsidering table talk: Critical thoughts on the relationship between sociology, autobiography and self-indulgence. Qualitative Sociology, 19(1), 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, S. (2012). Writing the self into research: Using grounded theory analytic strategies in autoethnography. TEXT Special Issue: Creativity: Cognitive, Social and Cultural Perspectives, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. L. (1992). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raab, D. (2013). Transpersonal approaches to autoethnographic research and writing. The Qualitative Report, 18(Article 42), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/raab42.pdf

  • Reed-Danahay, D. E. (1997). Introduction. In D. E. Reed-Danahay (Ed.), Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social (pp. 1–17). Oxford, England: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2012). “You look very well for a transplant”: Autoethnographic narrative and identity in chronic kidney disease, kidney failure and the life post-transplant (Doctoral dissertation). Stellenbosch University, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, A. (1996). The fatal flaw: A narrative of the fragile body-self. Qualitative Inquiry, 2, 463–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 280–316). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, L. J. (2010). The use of autoethnography in educational research: Locating who we are in what we do. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 3(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman-Healy, L. M. (1992). A secret life in a culture of thinness: Reflections on body, food and bulimia. In C. Ellis & A. Bochner (Eds.), Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing (pp. 76–108). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, J. (2008). No longer loss: Autoethnographic stammering. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(6), 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richards, R. (2016). Subject to Interpretation. In: Pillay, D., Naicker, I., Pithouse-Morgan, K. (eds) Academic Autoethnographies. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-399-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-399-5_11

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-399-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics