Abstract
This chapter describes how Activity Theory (AT) was used as a framework for examining the development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for early career secondary teachers in science and technology. In this study, AT was proposed as a promising lens through which the complexity of the education context and the nature of teacher work could be explored as these beginning teachers built their PCK.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cowie, B., Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2008). The classroom InSiTE project: Understanding classroom interactions to enhance teaching and learning in science and technology. Wellington, New Zealand: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative.
De Miranda, M. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and engineering and technology teacher education: Issues for thought. Journal of the Japanese Society of Technology Education, 50(1), 17–26.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity Theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinin, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptulization. Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Hume, A. (2012). Primary connections: Stimulating the classroom in initial teacher education. Research in Science Education, 42, 551–565.
Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2010). Constructing CoRes – A strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 341–355. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9168-3
Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2013). Enhancing the practicum experience for pre-service chemistry teachers through collaborative CoRe design with mentor teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2107–2136. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9346-6
Hung, D., Tan, S., & Koh, T. (2006). From traditional to constructivist epistemologies: A proposed theoretical framework based on Activity Theory for learning communities. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(1), 37–55.
Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 121–140.
Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi:10.1080/03057260903142285
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mullhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301–1320.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
McCormack, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Design and Technology Education, 7, 141–159.
McCormack, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 21–44.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Padilla, K., Ponce-de-León, A. M., Rembado, F. M., & Garritz, A. (2008). Undergraduate professors’ pedagogical content knowledge: The case of ‘amount of substance’. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1389–1404. doi:10.1080/09500690802187033
Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2009). Measuring teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in primary technology education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(3), 327–338. doi:10.1080/02635140903162652
Roth, W.-M. (2004). Activity Theory and education: An introduction. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11(1), 1–8.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, J., Eames, C., Hume, A., & Lockley, J. (2012). Promoting pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) development for early career secondary teachers in science and technology using Content Representation (CoRes). Research in Science and Technological Education, 30(3), 327–343.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eames, C. (2016). Exploring Teacher Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Pck) Development Using Cores (Content Representations). In: Gedera, D.S.P., Williams, P.J. (eds) Activity Theory in Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-387-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-387-2_11
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-387-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)