Skip to main content

Fostering Knowledge Co-Construction through Training in Transactive Communication

Evidence for Training Effects from Analysing Students’ Discourse

  • Chapter
Book cover Open Spaces for Interactions and Learning Diversities

Abstract

Transactive communication is defined as referring to and building up on a learning partner’s idea. Thereby, the partner’s idea is transformed into a more elaborate one. Examples for transactive statements are critiquing the partner’s idea, extending the partner’s idea or integrating the partner’s idea with an idea of one’s own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antil, L. R., Jenkins, J. R., Wayne, S. K., & Vadasy, P. F. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualizations, and the relation between research and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 419–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmitia, M. & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2, 202–221. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1993.tb00014.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 403–436. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0904_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W., & Gibbs, J. C. (1983). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, M. W., Althof, W., Turner, V. D., & Bloch, D. (2008). Discourse, developments, and education. In F. Oser & W. Veugelers (Eds.), Getting involved: Global citizenship development and sources of moral values (pp. 189–201). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 732–749. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkowski, S., & Hänze, M. (2010). Soziale Kompetenzen, transaktives Interaktionsverhalten und Lernerfolg: experimenteller Vergleich zweier unterschiedlich gestalteter Gruppenunterrichtsbedingungen und Evaluation eines transaktivitäts-bezogenen Kooperationsskriptes [Social skills, transactive communication, and academic achievement – comparison of different collaborative arrangements and evaluation of scripting transactive communication]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 24, 241–257. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000020

  • Jurkowski, S., & Hänze, M. (2012). F& Hänze, M. (2012). 10-0652/a000020ogie, 24and academic achievement – comparison of different collaborative arrangements and evaluation of scripti [Fostering transactive interaction: Effects of training in transactive interaction on learning results in cooperative learning]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 44, 209–220. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000074

  • Kruger, A. C. (1992). The effect of peer and adult-child transactive discussions on moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, A. C. (1993). Peer collaboration: Conflict, cooperation or both?. Social Development, 2, 165–182. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1993.tb00012.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R., Miell, D., & Morgan, L. (2000). Social processes and creative collaboration in children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 405–415. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03172984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1, 12–21. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 781nal p. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203874790

  • Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 240–257. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223–246. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, H. A. (2005). Transactive discourse during assessment conversations on science learning. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/epse_diss/

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuitema, J., van Boxtel, C., Veugelers, W., & ten Dam, G. (2011). The quality of student dialogue in citizenship education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 85–107. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0038-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–51. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Boxtel, C., & Roelofs, E. (2001). Investigating the quality of students discourse: What constitutes a productive student discourse. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36, 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1–28. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709908x380772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (2010). Peer learning in the classroom. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 6, pp. 636–642). Oxford: Elsevier. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00616-3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71–95. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jurkowski, S., Hänzea, M. (2016). Fostering Knowledge Co-Construction through Training in Transactive Communication. In: Surian, A. (eds) Open Spaces for Interactions and Learning Diversities. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-340-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-340-7_7

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-340-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics