Skip to main content

Moral Education, Objectively Speaking

(1989)

  • Chapter
Becoming of Two Minds about Liberalism

Part of the book series: Moral Development and Citizenship Education ((MORA))

  • 424 Accesses

Abstract

This is a paper on one of the perennial, really big questions of ethics – the question of “objectivity” in moral judgment. In plain words, that question is, “What sense, if any, can we make of our felt experience that some moral judgments and their concomitant actions are ‘better than’ others?” Despite appearing in different forms to different philosophers, its difficulty and centrality to moral experience has been recognized by most, resulting in a very rich and varied history even just in Western philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boyd, D.R. (2016). Moral Education, Objectively Speaking. In: Becoming of Two Minds about Liberalism. Moral Development and Citizenship Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-319-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-319-3_6

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-319-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics