Skip to main content

Peer Assisted Reflection for Studio Music Teachers

Toward Transformative One-to-One Teaching and Learning

  • Chapter
Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching

Part of the book series: Professional Learning ((PROFL))

Abstract

Scholars continue to identify and describe various concerns about traditional approaches to one-to-one learning and teaching of music. These include the limited adaptability, relevance, and generalisability of the learning that often takes place (e.g., Mills, 2002; Carey & Grant, 2014); student submissiveness and dependence, teacher dominance, and other issues of power that can arise between teacher and learner (Burwell, 2013; Carey, 2008; Long, Creech, Gaunt, & Hallam, 2014); and the lack of formal accreditation for one-to-one pedagogy (Gaunt, 2009), meaning that standards of teaching across and even within institutions may be erratic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Association of European Conservatoires. (2010). Quality assurance and accreditation in higher music education. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Association of European Conservatoires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, B. R. (2000). Teachers leading their own professional growth: Self-directed reflection and collaboration and changes in perception of self and work in secondary school teachers. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(1), 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Berkshire: SRHE & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, M. (1994). Using video in research: Spotlights. Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://www.sfu.ca/media-lab/cmns362/Spotlight45.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Burwell, K. (2005). A degree of independence: Teachers’ approaches to instrumental tuition in a university college. British Journal of Music Education, 22(3), 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burwell, K. (2013). Apprenticeship in music: A contextual study for instrumental teaching and learning. International Journal of Music Education, 31(3), 276–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calandra, B., Brantley-Dias, L., & Dias, M. (2006). Using digital video for professional development in urban schools: A preservice teacher’s experience with reflection. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(4), 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, G. (2008). New understanding of ‘relevant’ keyboard pedagogy in tertiary institutions. Saarbrucken, Germany: Verlag Dr. Muller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, G., & Grant, C. (2014a). Teacher and student perspectives on one-to-one pedagogy: Practices and possibilities. British Journal for Music Education, Firstview (Published online March 31, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, G., & Grant, C. (2014b). Teachers of instruments, or teachers as instruments? Moving from transfer to transformative approaches to one-to-one pedagogy. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Education of the Professional Musician Commission (CEPROM) July 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, G., Lebler, D., & Gall, S. (2012). Investigating the one-to-one teaching model in higher music education: Developing a collaborative model of inquiry. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentali: International Journal of Experimental Research in Education, 47(2), 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, G., Bridgstock, R., McWilliam, E., Taylor, P., & Grant, C. (2013a). Characterising one-to-one conservatoire teaching: Some implications of a quantitative analysis. Music Education Research, 3(15), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, G., Grant, C., McWilliam, E., & Taylor, P. (2013b). One-to-one pedagogy: Developing a protocol for illuminating the nature of teaching in the conservatoire. International Journal for Music Education, 31(2), 148–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. (1994). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, R. (2006). Exploring music instrument teaching and learning environments: Video analysis as a means of elucidating process and learning outcomes. Music Education Research, 8(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufon, J. (2002). Video recording in ethnographic SLA research: Some issues of validity in data collection. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt, H. (2007). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36(2), 215–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt, H. (2009). One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: The perceptions of instrumental and vocal students. Psychology of Music, 38(2), 178–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt, H., Creech, A., Long, M., & Hallam, S. (2012). Supporting conservatoire students towards professional integration: One-to-one tuition and the potential of mentoring. Music Education Research, 14(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, C., Abbott, L., & Harris, J. (2004). A teacher–developed process for collaborative professional reflection. Reflective Practice, 5(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, R. I. (1986). Effects of interpersonal dynamics in the student-teacher dyads on diagnostic and remedial content of four private violin lessons. Psychology of Music, 14, 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, K. P. (2005). Bringing transformative learning to life. Malabar, FL: Krieger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, M., & Reed, G. (2012). Instrumental and vocal teacher education: Competences, roles and curricula. Music Education Research, 14(3), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M., Creech, A., Gaunt, H., & Hallam, S. (2014). Conservatoire students’ experiences and perceptions of instrument-specific master classes. Music Education Research, 16(2), 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysaker, J., & Furuness, S. (2011). Space for transformation: Relational, dialogic pedagogy. Journal of Transformative Education, 9(3), 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. A., & Double, J. M. (1998). Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection. Innovations in Education and Training International, 35(2), 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCurry, D. (2000). Technology for critical pedagogy: Beyond self-reflection with video. In D. Willis, J. Price, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2000 (pp. 6–11). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Retrieved February 2, 2014, from http://www.editlib.org/p/15517

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, K. (2005). Teaching for transformation: From learning theory to teaching strategies. Speaking of Teaching, 14(2), 1–4. Retrieved March 21, 2014, from http://arrs.org/uploadedFiles/ARRS/Life_Long_Learning_Center/Educators_ToolKit/STN_transformation.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, G. J. (2013). Developing student autonomy in the one-to-one music lesson. International Journal of Music Education, 31(2), 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. (2002). Conservatoire students’ perceptions of the characteristics of effective instrumental and vocal tuition. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 153/154, 78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerland, M. (2007). One-to-one teaching as cultural practice: Two case studies from an academy of music. Music Education Research, 9(3), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, R. (2013). Learning cultures and the conservatoire: An ethnographically-informed case study. Music Education Research, 15(2), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, R. (1996). Studying with a musical maestro: A case study of commonsense teaching in artistic training. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, P. (2009). Lifelong learning for musicians: The place of mentoring. Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://www.hanze.nl/NR/rdonlyres/CD4D7120-7941-464E-864D-A3842DF405A7/0/ThePlaceofMentoring2009PeterRenshaw.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostvall, A.-L., & West, T. (2003). Analysis of interaction and learning in instrumental teaching. Music Education Research, 5(3), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, M. (2013). Reflective practice for teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. (1998). The theory and practice of transformative learning: A critical review. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregear, P. (2014). Enlightenment or entitlement? Rethinking tertiary music education. Platform papers: Quarterly Essays on the Performing Arts, 38. Strawberry Hills, Australia: Currency House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantafyllaki, A. (2010). Performance teachers’ identity and professional knowledge in advanced music teaching. Music Education Research, 12(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gyn, G. H. (1996). Reflective practice: The needs of professions and the promise of cooperative education. Journal of Cooperative Education, 31(Winter/Spring), 103–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Hartley, K. (2003). Video technology as a support for teacher education reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 11(1), 105–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C., & Scott, L. (2012). From the stage to the studio: How fine musicians become great teachers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, V., Burwell, K., & Pickup, D. (2003). Areas of study and teaching strategies in instrumental teaching: A case study research project. Music Education Research, 5(2), 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carey, G., Grant, C. (2015). Peer Assisted Reflection for Studio Music Teachers. In: Klopper, C., Drew, S. (eds) Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching. Professional Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-289-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics