Skip to main content

Pro-Teaching

Sharing Ideas to Develop Capabilities

  • Chapter
Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching

Part of the book series: Professional Learning ((PROFL))

  • 1553 Accesses

Abstract

The PRO-Teaching project was first piloted in 2009 at Griffith University, Australia with six academic teachers from the School of Education and Professional Studies and one from the School of Information and Communication Technology. This pilot assisted in streamlining the process and documentation, prior to implementation in the then Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology (SEET) Group in 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Buckingham, England & Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.-L., Farrell, K., Bell, M., Devlin, M., & James, R. (2008). In University of Melbourne, Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: A handbook to support institutions in developing effective policies and practices (p. 115, Series ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, S. A., & Kral, M. J. (2005). Practicing participatory action research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, L., & Nicholls, G. (2005). Enhancing teaching quality through peer review of teaching. Quality in Higher Education, 11(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, R. (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klopper, C., Drew, S., Mallitt, K. (2015). Pro-Teaching. In: Klopper, C., Drew, S. (eds) Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching. Professional Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-289-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics