Abstract
Professional development experiences for new teachers of science, called induction programs, help teachers progress along a continuum of development from a pre-service educator towards becoming a science education leader (Sato, Roehrig, & Donna, 2010). It is important that these induction programs provide content-specific support (e.g., support for teaching physics) and context-specific support (e.g., teaching students within an urban school) (Luft, 2003).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abell, S. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. Abell & N. Lederman, Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Achinstein, B., & Athanases, S. Z. (2006). Mentors in the making: Developing new leaders for new teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should know and be able to do (pp. 1–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Britton, E., & Raizen, S. (2003). Comprehensive teacher education induction in five countries: Implications for supporting U.S. science teachers. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Science teacher retention: Mentoring and renewal (Issues in Science Education) (pp. 13–21). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Danielson, C. (2011). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wie, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Stelios, O. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
Doering, A., Miller, C., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). Adventure learning: Educational, social, and technological affordances for collaborative hybrid distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 249–266.
Donna, J. D. (2009). Surviving and thriving as a new science teacher: Exploring the role of comprehensive online induction (Doctoral dissertation). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Donna, J. D., & Hick, S. R. (2015, January). Warming up to teaching and learning science the NGSS way: Results from a year 1 pilot of an on-line educative curriculum guide on convection. Paper presented at the Association of Science Teacher Educators International Conference, Portland, OR.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013–1055.
Fulton, K., Yoon, C., & Lee, C. (2005). Induction into learning communities. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
Gentry, L., Denton, C., & Kurz, T. (2008). Technologically-based mentoring provided to teachers: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(3), 339–373.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world : What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hawkes, M., & Romiszowski, A. (2001). Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 283–306.
Huling-Austin, L. (1992). Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 173–180.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium, Science Standards Drafting Committee (2002). Model standards in science for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Jaffe, R., Moir, E., Swanson, E., & Wheeler, G. (2006). EMentoring for Student Success. In C. Dede (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 89–116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Kahle, J. B., & Kronebusch, M. (2003). Science teacher education: From a fractured system to a seamless continuum. Review of Policy Research, 20(4), 585–602.
Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J., Kreijn, K., & Jelle Beers, P. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 44–66.
Koballa, T., & Bradbury, L. (2009). Mentoring in support of science teaching. In A. Collins & N. Gillespie (Eds.), The continuum of secondary science teacher preparation: Knowledge, questions, and research recommendations (pp. 171–187). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 178–194.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Luft, J. (2003). Induction programs for science teachers: What the research says. In J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Science teacher retention: Mentoring and renewal (Issues in Science Education) (pp. 34–45). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works (Vol. 5). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Sato, M., Roerhig, G. H., & Donna, J. D. (2010). Bending the professional teaching continuum: How teacher renewal supports teacher retention. In J. Rhoton (Ed.), Science education leadership: Best practices for the new century. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? Information Society, 13(3), 203–220.
Wang, J., Odell, S., & Schwill, S. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers’ teaching: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 132–152.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donna, J.D., Roehrig, G.H. (2015). Moving towards Comprehensive Induction Systems for New Teachers of Science through the Use of Technology Enhanced Communities of Practice. In: Luft, J.A., Dubois, S.L. (eds) Newly Hired Teachers of Science. Cultural and Historical Perspectives on Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-283-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-283-7_9
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-283-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)