Abstract
Doug was a few months into his first year as an assistant professor when one of his MSU colleagues, Monica, invited him to lunch. Not one to decline such offers, they met off campus at Raymond’s, a restaurant in the town of Montclair, on a snowy day shortly thereafter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Achieve Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington (DC), WA: National Academies Press.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
Boaler, J. (2009). What’s math got to do with it? New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Bransford, J. D., & Donovan, S. (2005). Scientific inquiry and how people learn. In National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on How People Learn A Targeted Report for Teachers (Ed.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 397–420). Washington (DC), WA: National Academies Press.
City, E. A. (2011). Learning from instructional rounds. Educational Leadership, 69(2), 36–41.
Clift, R., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, M. Cochran-Smith, & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 309–424). Mahwah, NJ: Published for the American Educational Research Association by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (1998). The golem: What you should know about science (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642.
Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651.
Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31(787), 121–127.
Hewson, P. W., Tabachnick, B. R., Zeichner, K. M., & Lemberger, J. (1999). Educating prospective teachers of biology: Findings, limitations, and recommendations. Science Education, 83(3), 373–384.
Hiebert, J. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Larkin, D. B. (2014). Structures and strategies for science teacher education in the 21st century. Teacher Education & Practice, 27(2).
Lawson, A. E. (2005). What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 617–740.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington (DC), WA: The National Academies Press.
Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I., & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP) reference manual. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2010). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 245–253.
Schneps, M. H., Sadler, P. M., & Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. (1987). A private universe [video recording]. Washington (DC), WA: Annenberg/CPB.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.
Smith, L. K., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2004). Elementary science methods courses and the national science education standards: Are we adequately preparing teachers? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(2), 91–110.
Stewart, J. H., Cartier, J. L., & Passmore, C. M. (2005). Developing understanding through model based inquiry. In National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on How People Learn A Targeted Report for Teachers (Ed.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 515–565). Washington (DC), WA: National Academies Press.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112.
Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of “inquiry”: How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481–512.
Windschitl, M. (2008). What is inquiry? A framework for thinking about authentic scientific practice in the classroom. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp. 1–20). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.21027
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1/2), 89–99. doi:10.1177/0022487109347671
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larkin, D., Monteiro, A.K., Poole, S. (2015). Science Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development in an Urban Teacher Residency. In: A Year in the Life of a Third Space Urban Teacher Residency. Bold Visions in Educational Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-253-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-253-0_8
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-253-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)