Abstract
During the last years we have noticed an increasing attention in mathematics education research addressing agency (see for example Andersson, 2011; Björklund Boistrup, 2010; Boaler & Greeno, 2000; Grootenboer & Jorgensen, 2010; Grootenboer & Zevenbergen, 2007; Lange, 2010; Macmillan, 2004; Martin, 2000; Norén, 2010; Powell, 2004; Wagner, 2004, 2007). Why agency at this point in time? According to Ahearn (2001) one answer, that we agree with, is that there is a clear connection of interests in approaches that foreground practice on the one hand, and social movement on the other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
Andersson, A. (2011). Engagement in education: Identity narratives and agency in the context of mathematics education (PhD Dissertation). Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Andersson, A., & Norén, E. (2011). Agency in mathematics education. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings from 7th conference for European research in mathematics education (pp. 1389–1398). Rzeszów, Poland: ERME.
Andersson, A., & Valero, P. (2015). Negotiating critical pedagogical discourses: Contexts, mathematics and agency. In P. Ernest & B. Sriraman (Eds), Critical mathematics education: Theory, praxis and reality (pp. 203–228). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Barwell, R. (2009). Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: An introductory discussion. In R. Barwell (Ed.), Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: Global perspectives (pp. 1–13). Toronto, Canada: Multilingual Matters.
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agencyas-achievement (Working Paper, 5). Exeter, England: University of Exeter School of Education and Lifelong Learning. Retrieved from www.tlrp.org
Boaler, J. (2002). Studying and capturing the complexity of practice: The case of “Dance of agency”. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International group for the psychology of mathematics education conference (pp. 3–16). Hawaii, HI: PME.
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Bolaer (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). London, UK: Ablex Publishing.
Foucault, M. (1969/2002). Vetandets arkeologi (L’archéologie du savoir). Lund, Sweden: Arkiv förlag.
Foucault, M. (1971/1993). Diskursens ordning (L’ordre du discourse). Stehag, Sweden: Brutus Östlings bokförlag.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. London, UK: Harvester.
Foucault, M. (1982/2002). Afterword: The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., pp. 208–216). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1984/2006). In P. Rabinov (Ed.), The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thoughts. London, UK: Penguin Books
Fuchs, S. (2007). Agency (and intention). In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
Grootenboer, P., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Towards a theory of identity and agency in coming to learn mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 255–266.
Gruber, S. (2008). När skolan gör skillnad: Skola, etnicitet och institutionell praktik (Dissertation). Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Haglund, C. (2005). Social interaction and identification among adolescents in multilingaul Suburban Sweden – A study of institutional order and sociocultural change. Stockholm, Sweden: Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University.
Khisty, L. L. (1995). Issues of language and meaning in mathematics teaching with Hispanic students. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 279–297). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes of media of contemporary communication. London, UK: Arnold.
Lange, T. (2010). Tell them that we like to decide for ourselves: Children’s agency in mathematics education. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 2587–2596). Lyon, France: European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Lerman, S. (2006). Theories of mathematics education: Is plurality a problem? ZDM – Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(1), 8–13.
Martin, D. B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical thinking and learning. Special Issue on “Diversity, Equity, and Mathematical Learning”, 4(2–3), 182–212.
Norén, E. (2010). Flerspråkiga matematikklassrum: Diskurser i grundskolans matematikundervisning (Phd Dissertation). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University.
Norén, E. (2011). 30 Grade-eight students: Discourse switch and bilingual students solving text problems in mathematics. In M. Setati, T. Nkambule, & L. Goosen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI 21 study conference: Mathematics education and language diversity (pp. 292–300). São Paolo, Brazil: ICMI.
Powell, A. (2004). The diversity backlash and the mathematical agency of students of colour. In M. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 37–54). Bergen, Norway: PME.
Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for cennecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 165–178.
Runfors, A. (2003). Mångfald, motsägelser och marginaliseringar: En studie av hur invandrarskap formas i skolan. Stockholm, Sweden: Prisma.
SOS. (2009/2010). Skolor och elever i grundskolan läsår 2009/10, tabell 8B. Retrieved from www.skolverket.se/sb/d/1638
Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (2007). Mathematics test: Year 9. Part A – Oral part. PRIM-gruppen. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Institute of Education.
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poeher (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–188). London, UK: Equinox.
Wagner, D. (2004). Silence and voice in the secondary mathematics classroom (Doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Wagner, D. (2007). Students’ critical awareness of voice and agency in mathematics classroom discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 31–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Norén, E., Anderson, A. (2016). Multilingual Students’ Agency in Mathematics Classrooms. In: Halai, A., Clarkson, P. (eds) Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Multilingual Classrooms. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-229-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-229-5_8
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-229-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)