Skip to main content

Personalised Learning and Differentiation in Studio Arts

Juggling Prescriptive Curriculum and Artistic Nurture

  • Chapter
Personalising Learning in Open-Plan Schools
  • 756 Accesses

Abstract

Arts educators now broadly agree that quality school learning experiences in this field should address both intrinsic and extrinsic goals, leading to multiple outcomes (Clapp & Edwards, 2013; Seidel, 2013; Smith, 2014). Intrinsic goals relate to students developing and valuing a personalised aesthetic capability or creative artistic intelligence (including understandings, dispositions and skills) through studio-like activities and through guided appreciation of past art products and history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. doi:10.1126/science.1204153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (Eds.). (2012). Carnal knowledge: Towards a ‘new materialism’ through the arts. London, UK: I. B Tauris & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2009). Making right choices? An ethnographic account of creativity, performativity and personalised learning policy, concepts and practices. Oxford Review of Education, 35(6), 689–704. doi:10.1080/03054980903122267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Robinson, W., Neelands, J., Hewston, R., & Mazzoli, L. (2007). Personalised learning: Ambiguities in theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 135–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00370.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, E. P., & Edwards, L. A. (2013). Editors’ introduction: Expanding our vision for the arts in education. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 5–14. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/docview/1326778673?accountid=12001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1987). The direct teaching of thinking as a skill. In M. Heiman & J. Slomianko (Eds.). Thinking skills instruction: Concepts and technique (pp. 218–229). West Haven, CT: NEA Professional Library. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ed306559.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32. doi: /10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.003

  • Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (1988). Strategies for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. (2010). The arts and Australian education: Realising potential. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgasz, H. (2010). Streaming for mathematics in years 7–10 in Victoria: An issue of equity? Maths Education Research Journal, 22(1), 57–90. doi:10.1007/BF03217559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallager, S.(2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Groff, J. (2013). Expanding our frames of mind for education and the arts. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 15–39. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/docview/1326778752?accountid=12001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (Eds.). (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom: Practical applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (2009). The three cultures: Natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in the 21st century. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macbeath, J. (2004). Democratic learning and school effectiveness: Are they by any chance related? In J. Macbeath & L. Moos (Eds.), Democratic learning: The challenge to school effectiveness (pp. 19–51). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McTighe, J., & Brown, J. L. (2005). Differentiated instruction and educational standards. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., Haywood, N., Sachdev, D., & Faraday, S. (2008). Independent learning literature review: Learning and skills network. London, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, J. W. (2010). International evidence on ability grouping with curriculum differentiation and the achievement gap in secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1492–1528. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebba, J., Brown, N., Steward, S., Galton, M., & James, M. (2007). An investigation of personalised learning approaches used in schools. Nottingham, England: DfES Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, S. (2013). Foreword: Exploding parameters and an expanded embrace: A proposal for the arts in education in the twenty-first century. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 1–4. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/docview/1326778670?accountid=12001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S., Nielsen, N., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Eds.). (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A. (2014). The sense of art: A study in aesthetic education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. A., Brimijoin, K., & Narvaez, L. (2008). The differentiated school: Making revolutionary changes in teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keeffe, M., Lovejoy, V. (2015). Personalised Learning and Differentiation in Studio Arts. In: Prain, V., et al. Personalising Learning in Open-Plan Schools. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-193-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics