Skip to main content

Conundrums for Youth Policy and Practice

  • Chapter

Abstract

As Bessant (2008, p. 347) points out with considerable dismay, more recently neurological science has been used to argue that young people as an entire cohort are “a ‘high risk group’ who are irresponsible, troublesome, rebellious, and even criminally inclined, and that this can be explained in terms of the biological development of the human brain”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, T. (2014). Doorstop interview, Melbourne, 26 August 2014. Available: http://www.pm.gov.au/media/2014-08-26/doorstop-interview-melbourne

  • Anglicare (2104). Being a/part. State of the family report. Website. Available: http://www.anglicare.asn.au/site/being_a_part__state_of_the_family_report_2014.php

  • Batten, M. and Russell, J. (1995). Students at risk. A review of Australian literature 1980-1994. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J. (2008). Hard wired for risk: Neurological science, ‘the adolescent brain’ and developmental theory. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(3), 347-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakers, C., & Nicholson, B. (1988). On the fringe. Second chance education for disadvantaged young people. Canberra: The Youth Bureau (DEET).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words. Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In International encyclopaedia of education (Vol 3, 2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, J., & Farrugia, D. (2013). Unpacking the black box: The problem of agency in the sociology of youth, Journal of Youth Studies, 17(4), 461-474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics, the creation of the mods and rockers. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1994). Poverty and education. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 125-149,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R., White, V., & Johnston, K. (1992). An experiment in justice: The Disadvantaged Schools Program and the question of poverty, 1974-1990. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(4), 447-464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DECD [South Australia]. (2013). Innovative community action networks. Government of South Australia, Department of Education and Child Development. Available: http://www.ican.sa.edu.au/pages/aboutus/

  • DEEWR. (2011). Youth connections: Program guidelines September 2011. Government of Australia, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • DHEW [Department of Health, Education and Welfare]. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: Author. Available: www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html

  • Diamond, L. (2006). Triage for struggling adolescent readers. School Administrator, 63(4), 10-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, P., & Wyn, J. (2001). Youth, education and risk. Facing the future. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2011). A new narrative of young people’s health and well- being. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(5), 627-638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrugia, D. (2013). The possibility of symbolic violence in interviews with young people experiencing homelessness. In K. te Riele & R. Brooks (Eds.), Negotiating ethical challenges in youth research (pp. 109-121). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2007). Beyond “voice”: New roles, relations, and contexts in researching with young people. Discourse, 28(3), 301-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M., & Moss, P. (2011). Radical education and the common school. A democratic alternative. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • France, A. (2007). Understanding youth in late modernity. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1996). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, and participation. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Stanford University, 30 April-2 May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, B. (2014). Lifters and leaners: Why the idea of equality of opportunity is a big con. The Age, 17 June 2014. Available: http://www.theage.com.au/comment/lifters-and-leaners-why-the-idea-ofequality-of-opportunity-is-a-big-con-20140617-zsa6d.html

  • Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equality. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of funding for schooling. Final report. Canberra: DEEWR. Available: http://www.appa.asn.au/content/gonskireport/Review-of-Funding-for-Schooling-Final-Report-Dec-2011.pdf

  • Hess, A. (1986). Educational triage in an urban school setting. Metropolitan Education, 2, 39-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, J. (2014). Federal budget 2014 – full speech. Available: http://www.smh.com.au/business/federal-budget/federal-budget-2014-full-speech-20140513-3887i.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K., & Hayes, D. (2008). ‘This is as good as it gets’: Classroom lessons and learning in challenging circumstances. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 109-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellett, M. (2009). Children as researchers: What we can learn from them about the impact of poverty on literacy opportunities? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(4), 395-408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P. (2001) Youth at risk: Processes of individualisation and responsibilisation in the risk society, Discourse, 22(1), 23-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., McGregor, G., Hayes, D., & Te Riele, K. (2015). ‘Schools are for us’. The importance of distribution, recognition and representation to creating socially just schools. In S. Riddle, A. Black, & K. Trimmer (Eds.), Researching mainstreams, margins and the spaces in-between (pp. 152-169). London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. (2012). Foreword. In Youth Affairs Council of Victoria, Connect For: Improved outcomes for Victoria’s vulnerable young people. Conference program. Melbourne, 25-26 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, L. (1996). Spectacle in the dark: Youth as transgression, display, and repression. Educational Theory, 46(1), 1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scales, P. (2013). Teaching in the lifelong learning sector (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school. Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & Hattam, R. (2001). ‘Voiced’ research as a sociology for understanding ‘dropping out’ of school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(3), 401-415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & Wrigley, T. (2013). Living on the edge. Rethinking poverty, class and schooling. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Partners. (2001). Innovation and best practice in schools: Review of literature and practice. Canberra: DETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te Riele, K. (2012). Negotiating risk and hope: A case study of alternative education for marginalized youth in Australia. In W. Pink (Ed.), Schools and marginalized youth: An international perspective (pp. 31-79). Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Te Riele, K. (2014). Putting the jigsaw together: Flexible learning programs in Australia. Final report. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning. Available: http://dusseldorp.org.au/priorities/alternative-learning/jigsaw/

  • Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Government. (2010). Positive pathways for Victoria’s vulnerable young people: A policy framework to support vulnerable youth. Melbourne: Victorian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyn, J., & White, R. (1998). Young people, social problems and Australian youth studies. Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 23-38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Riele, K.T. (2015). Conundrums for Youth Policy and Practice. In: Riele, K.t., Gorur, R. (eds) Interrogating Conceptions of “Vulnerable Youth” in Theory, Policy and Practice. Innovations and Controversies: Interrogating Educational Change. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-121-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics