Skip to main content

Modeling the “Write” Teaching Practices

Instructor Influences on Preservice Teachers

  • Chapter
Teaching at Work

Abstract

Writing is infiltrating society at a higher rate than ever before. A curiously unintended, yet significant, consequence of the increased focus on technology has resulted in more words written each day. Rather than using oral language to communicate (via phone calls or face-to-face interactions), people are relying on the written word for communication (Yancey, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, M. S., & Bass, J. F. (1995). Effecting changes in student teachers’ attitudes toward writing. Reading Research and Instruction, 35(2), 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, S. A., & Stapleton, J. N. (2006). Preservice teachers teach writing: Implications for teacher educators. Reading Research and Instruction, 45(4), 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, M. S., PytlikZillig, L. M., & Bruning, R. H. (2009). Helping preservice teacher learn to assess writing: Practice and feedback in a web-based environment. Assessing Writing, 14, 38–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, H. C., & Fleischman, S. (2005). Challenges of value-added assessment. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 85–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, C., & Smith, R. (1992). Writing-intensive courses: Tools for curricular change. In S. H. McLeod & M. Soven (Eds.), Writing across the curriculum: A guide to developing programs (pp. 52–62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2012). Are attitudes toward writing and reading separable constructs? A study with primary grade children. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 28, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction of adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C., & Fink, B. (2002). Primary grade teachers’ theoretical orientations concerning writing instruction: Construct validation and a nationwide survey. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribbin, W. (1991). Writing across the curriculum: Assignments and evaluation. The Clearing House, 64(6), 365–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. H., & Grisham-Brown, J. (2011). Writing development over time: Examining preservice teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about writing. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32, 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M.,... Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilberg, R. S., Waxman, H. C., & Tharp, R. G. (2004). Purposes and perspectives on classroom observation research. In H. C. Waxman, R. G. Tharp, & R. S. Hilberg (Eds.), Observational research in U.S. classrooms: New approaches for understanding cultural and linguistic diversity (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observations: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O., Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Seattle, WA: Met Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: Can classroom observations identify practices that raise achievement? Education Next, 11(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D. K. (2009). A teacher educator writes and shares student perceptions of a publicly literate life. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 338–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, E. (2001). A rhetoric for writing teachers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, M. (2012). Exploring the role of lesson observation in the English education system: A review of methods, models, and meanings. Professional Development in Education, 38(5), 791–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. N. (2010). Preservice teachers as writers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 352–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Writing. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work. or a ticket out. New York, NY: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association. (2010a). Common Core State Standards. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 158–170). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., la Paro, K. M., Payne, C., Cox, M. J., & Bradley, R. (2002). The relation of kindergarten classroom environment to teacher, family, and school characteristics and child outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 102(3), 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, L. M., Pressley, M., & Hohan, L. (2008). Engaging instruction in middle school classrooms: An observational study of nine teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. R., Jr. (1971). Systematic observation of natural social phenomena. Sociological Methodology, 3, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. K. (2012). Modeling powerful social studies: Bridging theory and practice with preservice elementary teachers. The Social Studies, 103, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, T. J. (1998, November). Classroom observation: Issues regarding validity and reliability. Presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-south Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Smith L. J. (1996). Classroom observation measure observer’s manual. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., Alberg, M., & Lowther, D. (2004). Using classroom observation as a research and formative evaluation tool in educational reform: The school observation measure. In H. C. Waxman, R. G. Tharp, & R. S. Hilberg (Eds.), Observational research in U.S. classrooms: New approaches for understanding cultural and linguistic diversity (pp. 144–173). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1059–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuhlman, M. W., & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Profiles of educational quality in first grade. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). Can teacher evaluation improve teaching?: Evidence of systematic growth in the effectiveness of midcareer teachers. Education Next, 12(4), 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 751–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, H. C., & Padrón, Y. N. (2004). The uses of the classroom observation schedule to improve classroom instruction. In H. C. Waxman, R. G. Tharp, & R. S. Hilberg (Eds.), Observational research in U. S. classrooms: New approaches for understanding cultural and linguistic diversity (pp. 72–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, H. C., Padrón, Y. N., Franco-Fuenmayor, S. E., Huang, & S. L. (2009). Observing classroom instruction for ELLs from student, teacher, and classroom perspectives. Texas Association for Bilingual Education Journal, 11(1), 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Education Digest, 75(2), 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk Hoy, A., Davis, H., & Pape, S. J. (2006). Teacher knowledge and beliefs. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 715–737). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, K. B. (2004, October). Using multiple technologies to teach writing. Educational Leadership, 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hodges, T.S., Mctigue, E., Douglass, A.G., Weber, N.D., Wright, K.L., Garza, A.D.L. (2015). Modeling the “Write” Teaching Practices. In: Li, Y., Hammer, J. (eds) Teaching at Work. Advances in Teaching and Teacher Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-082-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics