Skip to main content

Kohlberg’s Unnoticed Dilemma —The External Assessment of Internal Moral Competence?

  • Chapter
Kohlberg Revisited

Part of the book series: Moral Development and Citizenship Education ((MORA))

Abstract

While Kohlberg broke new ground by defining moral behavior as behavior guided by internal moral orientations and by emphasizing the neglected structural aspect of moral behavior, in his methodology he relied on mainstream external scoring techniques which clearly contradict his theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, N. H. (1974). Information integration theory: A brief survey. In Krantz, D. H., Atkinson, R. C. Luce, R. D., & P. Suppes, P. (Eds.) Measurement, psycho-physics, and neural information processing. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. (1991). Moral-social development. In Anderson, N. H. (Ed.) Information integration theory, Vol. 3: Developmental theory. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1971). The life of the mind. Vol. 1: Thinking. Vol. 2: Willing. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brezinka, W. (1988). Competence as an aim of education. In Spieker, B. & Straughton, R. (Eds.) Philosophical issues in moral education and development. Philadelphia PA: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Speicher, B., Hewer, A., Candee, O., Gibbs, J. & Power, C. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. Vol. 2: Standard issue scoring manual. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. M. (1976). The original position. In Daniels, N. (Ed.) Reading Rawls. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. (1994). Kant-Lexikon. Hildesheim-Zürich-New York: Georg Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2013). The universalization of Western liberal democracy and the end of morality. In Nowak, E., Schrader, D., & Zizek, B. (Eds.) Educating competencies for democracy. New York, Bern, Frankfurt am Main, Vienna: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Transl. Ch. Lenhardt, & S. W. Nicholsen, Introduction by Th. McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. Vol. 1: Studies in deceit. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., May, M. A., & Maller, J. B. (1929). Studies in the nature of character. Vol. 2: Studies in self-control. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1777). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4320/20/h.htm

  • Kant, I. (1991). What is orientation in thinking? Trans. H. B. Nisbet. In Reiss, H. (Ed.) Kant. Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2004). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Trans. A. Wood. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years 10 to 16. University of Chicago. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1964). Development of moral character and moral ideology. In Hoffman, M.L. & Hoffman, L. W. (Eds.) Review of child development research, Vol. 1. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1973). Stages and aging in moral development––Some speculations. The Gerontologist, 13, 497–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). The meaning and measurement of moral judgment. In Kohlberg, L. (Ed.) Essays on moral development, Vol. 2: The psychology of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row. (Originally published 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (2010). Foreword. In Lind, G., Hartmann, H. A., & Wakenhut, R. (Eds.) Moral development and the social environment. Studies in the philosophy and psychology of moral judgment and education. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishing. (Originally published 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Ch. & Hewer, A. (1984). The current formulation of the theory. In Kohlberg, L. (Ed.) Essays on moral development, Vol. 2: The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G. (1978). Wie misst man moralisches Urteil? Probleme und alternative Möglichkeiten der Messung eines komplexen Konstrukts. [How can we measure moral judgment? Problems and alternative possibilities of measuring a complex construct.] In Portele, G. (Ed.) Sozialisation und Moral. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G. (1982). Experimental Questionnaires: A new approach to personality research. In Kossakowski, A. & Obuchowski, K. (Eds.) Progress in psychology of personality. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G. (1986). Cultural differences in moral judgment competence? A study of West and East European university students. Behavior Science Research, 20, 208–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G. (1989). Measuring moral judgment: A review of ‘The Measurement of Moral Judgment’ by Anne Colby and Lawrence Kohlberg. Human Development, 32, 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G. (2002). Ist Moral lehrbar? Ergebnisse der modernen moralpsychologischen Forschung. [Can morality be taught? Research findings from modern moral psychology]. 2nd Edition. Berlin: Logos-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G. (2008). The meaning and measurement of moral judgment competence revisited––A Dual-Aspect Model. In Fasko, D. & Willis, W. (Eds.) Contemporary philosophical and psychological perspectives on moral development and education. Cresskill. NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, E., Schrader, D. & Zizek, B. (Eds.) (2013). Educating competencies for democracy. New York, Bern, Frankfurt am Main, Vienna: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, H. (1962). Der kategorische Imperativ. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittel, S. M. & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1966). Measurement of moral values: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prehn, K. (2013). Moral judgment competence: A re-evaluation of the Dual-Aspect Theory based on recent neuroscientific research. In Nowak, E. et al. (Eds.) Educating competencies for democracy. New York, Bern, Frankfurt am Main, Vienna: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricken, F. (2003). Allgemeine Ethik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (2003). Hermeneutics as politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H. & Anderson, A. B. (1983). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In Rossi, P. H. & Nock, S. L. (Eds.) Measuring social judgments: The Factorial Survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schillinger, M. (2013). Verifying the Dual-Aspect Theory: A cross-cultural study on learning environment and moral judgment competence. In Nowak, E. et al. (Eds.) Educating competencies for democracy. New York, Bern, Frankfurt am Main, Vienna: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, S. (1996). Falling up - Poems and drawings. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. de (2008). Theological-Political Treatise. Trans. J. I. Israel, ed. by M. Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. For another source see: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/989

  • Spinoza, B. de (2009). The Ethics. Trans. R.H.M. Elwes. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3800/3800-h/3800-h.htm on 10.02.2014.

  • Spinoza, B. de (2012). A political treatise. Rendered into html by S. Thomas. University of Adelaide. Retrieved from http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/spinoza/benedict/political/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Solowjow, W. (1978). Deutsche Gesamtausgabe der Werke in 8 Vols. Vol. 1: Szylkarski, W., Lettenbauer, W., & Müller, L. (Eds.) Kritik der abstrakten Prinzipien. München: Wewel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, E. V. (1977). A study of Kohlberg's structural theory of moral development: A critique of liberal social science ideology. Human Development, 20, 352–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wester de Michelini, J. (2013). Discourse ethics, moral argumentation, and education for civic responsibility. A qualitative approach to Moral Judgment Test applied to young political scientists at a public university in Argentina. In Nowak, E. et al. (Eds.) Educating competencies for democracy. New York, Bern, Frankfurt am Main, Vienna: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. English translation retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5740/5740-pdf.pdf

  • Zhang J. & Yang, S. (2013). The research and development of the Moral Judgment Test in China. In Nowak, E. et al. (Eds.) Educating competencies for democracy. New York, Bern, Frankfurt am Main, Vienna: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lind, G., Nowak, E. (2015). Kohlberg’s Unnoticed Dilemma —The External Assessment of Internal Moral Competence?. In: Zizek, B., Garz, D., Nowak, E. (eds) Kohlberg Revisited. Moral Development and Citizenship Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-079-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics