Advertisement

European Civil Society, Rights and Non-Europeans: Thoughts Upon Reading AmsterdamFrom the Market to the European Society by Francisco Lucas Pires

  • Samo BardutzkyEmail author
Chapter
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

The chapter aims to be a reflection on the state of European citizenship (in a wide sense of the word) and civil society. The reflection takes place, on the one hand, during a time of important dilemmas on the course of European integration, and on the other hand, approximately two decades after the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty. Accordingly, it is inspired by one the most important achievements of Amsterdam: the reshaping of European law on immigration and asylum. The chapter takes as its starting point the last book of the Portuguese scholar Francisco Lucas Pires, in which he discussed the move, in the Amsterdam Treaty, from market to civil society. The chapter tries to frame the current conflict in the European civil society between those that advocate for future strengthening of European integration and at the same time agree with Europe’s moral and legal responsibilities towards the incoming refugees, and those that oppose them. It tries to provide an answer to these dilemmas by recognizing the role of rights, in part drawing upon the thought of Jürgen Habermas.

Keywords

Asylum European integration Civil society Public sphere Amsterdam Treaty Human rights Freedom of speech 

References

  1. Aus J P (2006) Eurodac: A Solution Looking for a Problem? European Integration online Papers, Vol. 10, 2006. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2006-006.pdf. Accessed 18 February 2019
  2. Bardutzky S, Fahey E (2017) The Subjects and Objects of EU Law: Exploring a Research Platform. In: Bardutzky S, Fahey E (eds) Framing the Subjects and Objects of Contemporary EU Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  3. Bosworth M (2008) Border Control and the Limits of the Sovereign State. Social and Legal Studies, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 199–215.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663908089611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig P, De Burca G (2015) EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Danish Refugee Council (2018) DRC Policy Brief EU-Libya migration cooperation: Shipwrecked values of humanity. http://www.integrazionemigranti.gov.it/Documenti-e-ricerche/DRCPolicyBrief_EU-LibyaMigrationCooperation.pdf. Accessed 18 February 2019.
  6. Fabienne P (2017) Political Legitimacy. In: Zalta E N (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/legitimacy/. Accessed 18 February 2019.
  7. Finlayson G (2005) Habermas: Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Fratzke S (2015) Not Adding Up: The Fading Promise of Europe’s Dublin System. Migration Policy Institute Europe, Brussels. www.mpieurope.org. Accessed 18 February 2019.
  9. Fultner B (2014) Habermas: Key Concepts. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Habermas J (1996) Between Facts and Norms. The MIT Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Habermas J (2006) Opening up Fortress Europe. Let’s talk European, http://www.signandsight.com/features/1048.html. Accessed 23 April 2020.
  12. Haratsch A, Koenig C, Pechstein M (2009) Europarecht, 6. Auflage [European Law, 6th edn.]. Mohr Siebeck, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolman K (2019) Eksternalizacija kontrole migracij v EU [Externalisation of Migration Control in the European Union]. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana.Google Scholar
  14. O’Keeffe D (1999) Can the Leopard Change its Spots? Visas, Immigration and Asylum – Following Amsterdam. In: Twomey P, O’Keeffe D (eds) Legal Issues of the Amsterdam Treaty. Hart, Oxford, pp. 271–288.Google Scholar
  15. Schlenker A (2013). Cosmopolitan Europeans or partisans of fortress Europe? Supra-national identity patterns in the EU. Global Society, Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp. 25–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2012.734281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schütze R (2012) European Constitutional Law 2012. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Sitton J F (2003) Habermas and Contemporary Society. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ward I (1997), Law and the Other European. Journal for Common Market Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1997.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00051.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations