Advertisement

Asylum Law and Policy in the European Union Before and Beyond Amsterdam

For a Greater Juridification of the Community Law on Asylum
  • Francisco Lucas PiresEmail author
Chapter
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter discusses the evolution and current status of asylum policy in the European Union, and the prospective impact of the changes brought in the Treaty of Amsterdam. The chapter analysis both the Schengen and the Dublin legal instruments, and stresses that the changes in this policy field can be, at the end, the single most important development brought by Amsterdam.

Keywords

Asylum policy Schengen Third pillar Migration Community law 

References

  1. Araújo Torres M (1995) Introdução. Direito dos Estrangeiros, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  2. Christiansen A P and Kjaerum M (1990) Refugees and Our Role in the European House. IJRL (special issue).Google Scholar
  3. Cruz A (1996) Nouveaux Contrôleurs d’Immigration: Transporteurs Menacés de Sanctions. Paris.Google Scholar
  4. D’Oliveira J (1994) Expanding External and Shrinking Internal Borders: Europe’s Defense Mechanisms in the Area of Free Movement, Immigration and Asylum. In: O’Keeffe and Twomey (eds) Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty. London.Google Scholar
  5. Den Boer M (ed) (1997) Schengen, Judicial Cooperation and Policy Coordination.Google Scholar
  6. Drüke L (1993) Einleitung. In: Dücke L and Weigelt K (eds) Fluchtziel Europa. Munich/Landsberg, p. 20.Google Scholar
  7. ECRE (1993) Asylum in Europe: An Introduction. Vol. 1. ECRE, London.Google Scholar
  8. Garrone P (1993) La Libre Circulation des Personnes. Zurich.Google Scholar
  9. Goodwin-Gill G S (1983) The Refugee in International Law. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Gorjão-Henriques M (1996) Aspectos Gerais dos Acordos de Schengen na Perspectiva da Livre Circulação de Pessoas na União Europeia. Vol. 1, No. 2, Coimbra—Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  11. Hailbronner K (1990) The Right to Asylum and the Future of Asylum Procedures in the European Community. International Journal of Refugee Law, Vol. 2, No. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hailbronner K (1995) Aüslanderrecht, Kommentar, loose leaf edn., Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  13. Hailbronner K and Thiery C (1997) Schengen II and Dublin: Responsibility for Asylum Applications in Europe. Common Market Law Review, 34, pp. 964 et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Handoll J (1995) Free Movement of persons in the EU. Chichester.Google Scholar
  15. Hoogenboom T (1992) Integration into Society and Free Movement of Non-EC Nationals. EJIL, Vol. 3, No. 1.Google Scholar
  16. Joly D (1996) Heaven or Hell? Asylum Policies and Refugees in Europe. Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  17. Joly D and Cohen R (eds) (1989) Reluctant Hosts: Europe and its Refugees. Gower Press, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  18. Joly D, Nettleton C and Poulton H (1992) Refugees: Asylum in Europe. MRG, London.Google Scholar
  19. Martin D (1994) La Libre Circulation de Personnes dans L’Union Européenne. Brussels.Google Scholar
  20. Meijers H (1990) Refugees in Western Europe: “Schengen” affects the entire Refugee Law. IJRL, 428.Google Scholar
  21. Mortimer E (1997) The Treatment of Refugees and Asylum-Seekers. Journal of Refugee Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 201–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Müller Graff P C (1997) Justiz und Inneres nach Amsterdam – Die Neuerungen in erster und dritter Säule. Integration 4/97.Google Scholar
  23. O’Keeffe D (1994) Reflections on a European Immigration Policy. In: O’Keeffe and Twomey (eds) Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty. London, pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
  24. Pereira P (1993) The Draft Convention on External Borders and Asylum Policy on the Level of the Twelve Member States. In: Korella G D and Tworney P M (eds) Towards a European Immigration Policy.Google Scholar
  25. Perez-Prat Durbán L (1997) La Unión Europea, ¿Tierra de Asilo? Meridiano CERI, August, pp. 22–25.Google Scholar
  26. Rupprecht R (1997) Justiz und Inneres nach dem Amsterdam Vertrag. Integration 4/97.Google Scholar
  27. Ward J (1997) Law and Other Europeans. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31, March, pp. 79–95.Google Scholar
  28. Weiler J H H (1992) Thou Shall Not Oppress a Stranger: On the Judicial Protection of the Human Rights of Non-EC Nationals—A Critique. European Journal of International Law, Vol.3, No. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations