Abstract
This chapter considers the influence which sources of international law, with the exception of treaty law, have on the horizontal system of enforcement. There exists relatively widespread consensus to the effect that important treaty provisions, such as the aut dedere aut judicare rule, have passed into customary international law. Such consensus, although broad, cannot be considered as overwhelming particularly because, in the first place, even conventionally, the aut dedere aut judicare rule presents itself in many forms. Such different formulae and their subsequent differentiated adherence could have a prejudicial impact on the customary status of the aut dedere aut judicare rule. This is because, since the 1985 Continental Shelf case, the ICJ asserted that the substance of customary international law must be looked for primarily at the actual practice and opinio juris of States. A traceable and influential nexus also exists between customary international law, on the one hand, and general principles of law, on the other hand. Domestic courts can play a role in forming customary international law, in that their decisions constitute State practice. Such dicta can constitute both State practice and opinio juris. Municipal judgments also have the potential to form and identify general principles of law. This is particularly so in relation to substantive international criminal law (especially the constitutive elements of core crimes), but it is not so self-evident when State practice on extradition is examined with the sources of international law (for such purpose, customary international law and general principles of law) in mind.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Meron 2005, p. 820.
- 2.
ICJ , Continental Shelf case (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Malta) , 3 June 1985, [1985] ICJ Rep. 13, para 27.
- 3.
Schlutter 2010, pp. 71–86.
- 4.
Thirlway 1984, p. 624.
- 5.
Lepard 2010, p. 162.
- 6.
ILC 1950, para 54.
- 7.
Nollkaemper 2011, p. 267.
- 8.
Nollkaemper 2011, p. 268.
- 9.
Nollkaemper 2011, p. 245.
- 10.
Nollkaemper 2011, p. 272.
- 11.
Article 38(1) of the ICJ Statute (1946) Statute of the International Court of Justice.
References
ICJ Statute (1946) Statute of the International Court of Justice
ILC (1950) Ways and Means for Making the Evidence of Customary International Law More Readily Available. Report of the ILC to the UNGA. http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/reports/1_4_1950.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2011
Lepard BD (2010) Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications. ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory, CUP, Cambridge
Meron T (2005) Revival of Customary Humanitarian Law. AJIL 99(4):817–834
Nollkaemper A (2011) National Courts and the International Rule of Law. OUP, Oxford
Schlutter B (2010) Developments in Customary International Law: Theory and Practice of the International Court of Justice and the International Ad Hoc Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia. MNP, Leiden/Boston
Thirlway H (1984) Dilemma or Chimera? Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence in International Adjudication. AJIL 78(3):622–641
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 T.M.C. Asser Press and the author
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soler, C. (2019). The Impact of Customary International Law and General Principles of Law on the Horizontal System of Enforcement. In: The Global Prosecution of Core Crimes under International Law. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-335-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-335-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague
Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-334-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-335-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)