Advertisement

National Responses to the Rwandan Genocide: Gacaca Courts

  • Pietro SulloEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Criminal Justice Series book series (ICJS, volume 20)

Abstract

This chapter provides an insight into gacaca legislation and the unfolding of the gacaca experiment. The key features of the pre-colonial gacaca are first sketched, which allows us to compare traditional gacaca to inkiko gacaca. This comparison offers a necessary perspective to discuss some of the main assumptions surrounding the use of these jurisdictions to deal with the legacy of the Rwandan genocide. The different gacaca laws which have been adopted between 2000 and 2012 are then scrutinized in-depth. This is necessary to understand the legal frame regulating the courts. Due attention is given to changes in the criteria for the categorization of genocide-related offences established by the gacaca legislation, to the confession and guilty plea procedure, to the sanctions and to the mechanisms governing penalty reductions.

Keywords

Gacaca traditional justice systems legal pluralism guilty plea compensation fund restorative justice categorization of offences confession 

References

  1. African Rights (2003) Gacaca Justice: A Shared responsibility. Kigali, RwandaGoogle Scholar
  2. Alessi G (2002) Il Processo Penale, Profilo Storico. Laterza, Bari-RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Alessi G (2005) Il Soggetto e L'Ordine. Percorsi dell'Individualismo nell'Europa Moderna. Giappichelli Editore, TurinGoogle Scholar
  4. Avocats Sans Frontières (2005) I Rapport Analytique. Brussels-KigaliGoogle Scholar
  5. Avocats Sans Frontières (2007b) IV Rapport Analytique. Brussels-KigaliGoogle Scholar
  6. Avocats Sans Frontières (2010) V Rapport Analytique. Brussels-KigaliGoogle Scholar
  7. Bornkamm P (2012) Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts: Between Retribution and Reparation. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark P (2010) The Gacaca Courts, Post-genocide Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda, Justice without Lawyers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Digneffe F, Fierens J (2002) (eds) Justice et gacaca. L’expérience rwandaise et le génocide. Presses Universitaires de Namur, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  10. Drumbl M (2007) Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Fierens J (2005) Gacaca Courts: Between Fantasy and Reality. 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3(4):896–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gourevitch P (1998) We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed with Our Families. Picador, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Human Rights Watch (2008) Law and Reality, Progress in Judicial Reforms in Rwanda, https://www.hrw.org/report/2008/07/25/law-and-reality/progress-judicial-reform-rwanda. Last accessed 28 February 2018
  14. Ibuka et al (2012) Right to Reparation for Survivors: Recommendations for Reparation for Survivors of the 1994 Genocide Against Tutsi. Survivors Fund/Redress, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingelaere B (2016) Inside Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts. The University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  16. Karekezi UA (2001) Lutte contre l’impunité et promotion de la réconciliation Nationale. Les juridictions gacaca et les processus de réconciliation nationale (No. 3). Centre de gestion des conflits, Editions de l’Université nationale du RwandaGoogle Scholar
  17. Palmer N (2015) Courts in Conflict: Interpreting the Layers of Justice in Post-Genocide Rwanda. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Penal Reform International (2002a) Gacaca jurisdictions and its preparations, July–December 2001, Research on Gacaca Report I. London/KigaliGoogle Scholar
  19. Penal Reform International (2002b) The gacaca research project in Rwanda. An in-depth field study concerning gacaca jurisdictions and Community Service, Report III. London/KigaliGoogle Scholar
  20. Penal Reform International (2005) Integrated Report on Gacaca Research and Monitoring, Pilot Phase January 2002–December 2004. KigaliGoogle Scholar
  21. Pozen J et al (2014) Assessing the Rwanda Experiment: Popular Perceptions of Gacaca in Its Final Phase. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8:31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prunier G (1997) The Rwanda Crisis, History of a Genocide. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Rettig M (2008) Gacaca: Truth, Justice and Reconciliation in Postconflict Rwanda? African Studies Review, 51(3):25–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sullo P (2016) Restorative Justice. In: Wolfrum R (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (1996) Gacaca: Le Droit Coutumier au Rwanda. UNHCHR, RwandaGoogle Scholar
  26. UN Human Rights Committee (2009) Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/co/CCPR-C-RWA-CO3.doc. Last accessed 28 February 2018

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the author 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brussels School of International StudiesUniversity of KentBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations