Advertisement

Extraterritorial Obligations and the Obligation to Protect

  • Sigrun SkoglyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law book series (NYIL, volume 47)

Abstract

Since the late 1970s, what we today label ‘globalisation’ has altered many aspects of international law, not least international human rights law. This has been reflected inter alia in increased calls for universal respect for human rights beyond a state’s territorial border. The challenges to territoriality in this regard does not only relate to the actions of states abroad, but also with respect to their regulation of the conduct of business enterprises over which they exert significant influence. The chapter analyses the European Court of Human Rights’ jurisprudence and practice of the UN human rights bodies, and argues that extraterritorial human rights obligations have become an integral part of international human rights law. It is held that what has been seen as ‘exceptional’ now represent ‘common practice’. This conclusion is then applied to the discussion of the new treaty on human rights as currently being drafted.

Keywords

Extraterritorial human rights obligations Business and human rights Obligation to protect Jurisdiction Transnational corporations Treaty on business and human rights 

References

  1. Beckler RW, Kirtland MH (2003) Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Antitrust Law: What Is a ‘Direct, Substantial, and Reasonably Foreseeable Effect’ Under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act? Texas International Law Journal 38:11–25Google Scholar
  2. Çali B (2014) Specialized Rules of Treaty Interpretation: Human Rights. In: Hollis DB (ed) The Oxford Guide to Treaties. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 525–547Google Scholar
  3. De Schutter O (2016) Towards a New Treaty on Business and Human Rights. Business and Human Rights Journal 1(1):41–67Google Scholar
  4. De Schutter O, Eide A, Khalfan A, Orellana M, Salomon ME, Seiderman I (2012) Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 34(4):1084–1169Google Scholar
  5. Dixon M, McCorquodale R (2000) Cases and Materials on International Law, 3rd edn. Blackstone Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibney M (2013) On Terminology: Extraterritorial Obligations. In: Langford M, Vandenhole W, Martin S, van Genugten W (eds) Global Justice, State Duties: The Extra-Territorial Scope of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 32–47Google Scholar
  7. Jonas DS, Saunders TM (2010) The Object and Purpose of a Treaty: Three Interpretive Methods. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 43, 3:565–608Google Scholar
  8. Knox JH (2010) Diagonal Environmental Rights. In: Gibney M, Skogly S (eds) Universal Human Rights and Extraterritorial Obligations. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 82–103Google Scholar
  9. Moeckli D, White ND (2016) Treaties as ‘Living Instruments’. In: Bowman M, Kritsiotis D (eds) Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  10. Salomon ME (2007) Global Responsibility for Human Rights: World Poverty and the Development of International Law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Skogly S (2010) Extraterritoriality: Universal Human Rights Without Universal Obligations. In: Joseph S, Adam M (eds) Research Handbook on International Human Rights Law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, pp 71–96Google Scholar
  12. The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2015) Human Rights Law Sources: UN Pronouncements on Extra-Territorial Obligations. Concluding Observations, General Comments and Recommendations, Special Procedures, UPR Recommendations. Working Paper. http://globalinitiative-escr.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/151027-Human-Rights-Law-Sources-ETOs.pdf. Accessed 23 January 2017

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Rights Law, Centre for International Law and Human RightsLancaster University Law SchoolLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations