Advertisement

Cartographies of the Present: ‘Contingent Sovereignty’ and Territorial Integrity

  • Sara KendallEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law book series (NYIL, volume 47)

Abstract

Sovereignty as territorial integrity has been recast by state legal advisors, diplomats and scholars, who employ terms and principles from international law while disregarding the content of the law. This chapter takes up the apparent permeability of borders in contemporary discourses and practices of military intervention. In spaces of alleged terrorist activity the relationship between state and territory has been called into question, and the global legal imaginary of sovereign states is separated de facto into actual sovereigns and ‘contingent’ sovereigns. The claim that ineffective internal sovereignty may justify intervention forms part of a broader reconfiguration of the relationship between sovereignty and territory. Drawing upon insights from political geography, this chapter uses ‘contingent sovereignty’ as a critical diagnosis. It focuses on contemporary practices of drone warfare and emerging justifications for intervention that are premised upon a state’s unwillingness or inability to confront internal threats. It argues that the international legal order is recast in these cartographic projections, where territory operates as a political technology for preserving certain populations.

Keywords

Territory Sovereignty Drones Asymmetrical warfare Biopolitics 

References

  1. Aalberts T (2012) Constructing Sovereignty Between Politics and Law. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Aalberts T (2014) Rethinking the Principle of (Sovereign) Equality as a Standard of Civilization. Millenium: Journal of International Studies 42:767–789Google Scholar
  3. Aalberts T, Werner W (2011) Mobilizing Uncertainties and the Making of Responsible Sovereigns. Review of International Studies 37:2183–2200Google Scholar
  4. Agnew J (1994) The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory. Review of International Political Economy 1:53–80Google Scholar
  5. Agnew J (2010) Still Trapped in Territory? Geopolitics 15:779–784Google Scholar
  6. Ahmad M (2014) The Legality of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Outside the Combat Zone: A Case Study of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan. Defense and Security Analysis 30:245–253Google Scholar
  7. Anderson B (2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Anghie A (2005) Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Austin J L (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Bannelier-Christakis K (2016) Military Interventions against ISIL in Iraq, Syria and Libya, and the Legal Basis of Consent. Leiden Journal of International Law 29:743–775Google Scholar
  11. Bartelsen J (2014) Sovereignty as Symbolic Form. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Beck U (2002) The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited. Theory, Culture and Society 19:39–55Google Scholar
  13. Bethlehem D (2012) Self-Defense Against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Nonstate Actors. American Journal of International Law 106:769–776Google Scholar
  14. Boyle M (2015) The legal and ethical implications of drone warfare. International Journal of Human Rights 2:105–126Google Scholar
  15. Brown W (2010) Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. Zone Books, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Chamayou G (2015) Drone Theory. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavallaro J, Sonnenberg S, Knuckey S (2012) Living Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic, Stanford Law School, Stanford; NYU School of Law, Global Justice Clinic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Cockburn A (2015) Kill Chain: Drones and the Rise of High-Tech Assassins. Verso Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Corten O (2016) The ‘Unwilling or Unable’ Test: Has it Been, and Could it Be, Accepted? Leiden Journal of International Law 29:777–799Google Scholar
  20. Deeks A (2012) ‘Unwilling or Unable’: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense. Virginia Journal of International Law 52:483–550Google Scholar
  21. Derrida J (1998) Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. Desautels-Stein J (2015) Structuralist Legal Histories. Law and Contemporary Problems 78:37–59Google Scholar
  23. Duffield M (2007) Development, Security and Unending War. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Dreyfus H, Rabinow P (1982) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Elden S (2006) Contingent Sovereignty, Territorial Integrity, and the Sanctity of Borders. SAIS Review 26:11–24Google Scholar
  26. Elden S (2009) Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  27. Elden S (2010) Thinking Territory Historically. Geopolitics 15:757–761Google Scholar
  28. Elden S (2013) The Birth of Territory. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Etzioni A (2016) Defining Down Sovereignty: The Rights and Responsibilities of Nations. Ethics and International Affairs 30:5–20Google Scholar
  30. Finucane B (2012) Fictitious States, Effective Control, and the Use of Force Against Non-State Actors. Berkeley Journal of International Law 30:35–93Google Scholar
  31. Foucault M (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Foucault M (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1997–1978. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  33. Garland D (2014) What is a ‘History of the Present’? On Foucault’s Genealogies and Their Critical Preconditions. Punishment & Society 16:365–384Google Scholar
  34. Gregory D (2004) The Colonial Present. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Gregory D (2011) The Everywhere War. The Geographical Journal. 177(3):238–250Google Scholar
  36. Gregory D (2013) Dis/Ordering the Orient: Scopic Regimes and Modern War. In: Barkawi T, Stanski K (eds) Orientalism and War, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 151–176Google Scholar
  37. Grovogui S (1996) Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-determination in International Law. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  38. Gunneflo M (2016) Targeted Killing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Gusterson H (2016) Drone: Remote Control Warfare. MIT University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  40. Halblieb R, Earley M (1998) Transition to the Vertical Dimension: Advancing Airfighting Vehicles – The Army’s Future Fighting Force. Carlisle Barracks, U.S. Army War College/ Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Handl G, Zekoll J, Zumbansen P (eds) (2012) Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  42. Hardt M, Negri A (2000) Empire. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Heller KJ (2011) Targeted Killing: The Case of Anwar Al-Aulaqi. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 159:175–201Google Scholar
  44. Heller KJ (2013) ‘One Hell of a Killing Machine’: Signature Strikes and International Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice 11:89–119Google Scholar
  45. Hendrickson E (2014) Just War Theory Applied to US Policy in Pakistan and Yemen. Unpublished monograph, School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army and Command and General Staff CollegeGoogle Scholar
  46. Holder E (2012) Attorney General Eric Holder Speech at Northwest University Law School. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-eric-holder-speaks-northwestern-university-school-law. Accessed 10 August 2016
  47. Hussain N (2013) The Sound of Terror: Phenomenology of a Drone Strike. Boston ReviewGoogle Scholar
  48. Kahn P (2013) Imagining Warfare. European Journal of International Law 24:199–226Google Scholar
  49. Kendall S (2016) On Academic Production and the Politics of Inclusion. Leiden Journal of International Law 29:617–624Google Scholar
  50. Kennedy D (2006) Of War and Law. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  51. Klabbers J (2009) The Bridge Crack’d: A Critical Look at Interdisciplinary Relations. International Relations 23:119–125Google Scholar
  52. Koskenniemi M (2006) From Apology to Utopia. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Krasmann S (2012) Targeted Killing and its Law: On a Mutually Constitutive Relationship. Leiden Journal of International Law 25:665–682Google Scholar
  54. Kratochwil F (2012) The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Kritsiotis D (2009) Introduction: Public International Law and its Territorial Imperative. Michigan Journal of International Law 30:547–566Google Scholar
  56. Leander A (2013) Technological Agency in the Co-Constitution of Legal Expertise and the US Drone Program. Leiden Journal of International Law 26:811–831Google Scholar
  57. Mamdani M (2010) Responsibility to Protect or Right to Punish? Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1:53–67Google Scholar
  58. Mawani R (2012) Law’s Archive. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8:337–365Google Scholar
  59. McConnell F (2010) The Fallacy and the Promise of the Territorial Trap: Sovereign Articulations of Geopolitical Anomalies. Geopolitics 15:762–768Google Scholar
  60. Moyn S (2013) Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn. European Journal of International Law 24:227–233Google Scholar
  61. Munro C (2014) Mapping the Vertical Battlespace: Toward a Legal Cartography of Aerial Sovereignty. London Review of International Law 2:233–261Google Scholar
  62. Neocleous M (2011) The Police of Civilization: the War on Terror as Civilizing Offensive. International Political Sociology 5:144–159Google Scholar
  63. Neocleous M (2013) Air Power as Police Power. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31:578–593Google Scholar
  64. Obama B (2013) Remarks by the President at the National Defense University. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-national-defense-university. Accessed 10 August 2016
  65. Pahuja S (2011) Decolonizing International Law: Development, Economic Growth, and the Politics of Universality. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Patrick S (2004) The Role of the U.S. Government in Humanitarian Intervention. https://2001-2009.state.gov/s/p/rem/31299.htm. Accessed 6 January 2017
  67. Rajah J (2016) Law as Record: the Death of Osama bin Laden. No Foundations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Law and Justice 13:45–69Google Scholar
  68. Sanders R (2014) Legal Frontiers: Targeted Killing at the Borders of War. Journal of Human Rights 13:512–536Google Scholar
  69. Sassen S (2009) Bordering Capabilities versus Borders: Implications for National Borders. Michigan Journal of International Law 30:567–597Google Scholar
  70. Scharf M (2003) Earned Sovereignty: Juridical Underpinnings. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 31:373–387Google Scholar
  71. Schmitt M (2012) Unmanned Combat Aircraft Systems and International Humanitarian Law: Simplifying the Oft Benighted Debate. Boston University International Law Journal 30:595–619Google Scholar
  72. Schmitt M (2013) Extraterritorial Lethal Targeting: Deconstructing the Logic of International Law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 52:77–112Google Scholar
  73. Schmitt M (2014) Charting the Legal Geography of Non-International Armed Conflict. International Law Studies 90:1–19Google Scholar
  74. Shaw M (1982) Territory in International Law. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 13:61–91Google Scholar
  75. Stahn C (2003) Terrorist Acts as ‘Armed Attack’: The Right to Self-Defense, Article 51 (1/2) of the UN Charter, and International Terrorism. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 27:35–54Google Scholar
  76. Tzouvala N (2016) TWAIL and the ‘Unwilling or Unable’ Doctrine: Continuities and Ruptures. AJIL Unbound 109. https://www.asil.org/blogs/symposium-twail-perspectives-icl-ihl-and-intervention-twail-and-%E2%80%9Cunwilling-or-unable%E2%80%9D-doctrine. Accessed 15 August 2016
  77. United States Department of Justice (2011) Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen Who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al-Qa’ida or an Associated Force. https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/1903-doj-white-paper. Accessed 10 August 2016
  78. Werner W (2011) The Curious Career of Lawfare. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 43:61–72Google Scholar
  79. Winter Y (2011) The Asymmetric War Discourse and its Moral Economies: A Critique. International Theory 3:488–514Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations