Advertisement

The Dutch Referendum on the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement: Legal Implications and Solutions

  • Guillaume Van der LooEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law book series (NYIL, volume 47)

Abstract

This chapter will analyse the legal consequences of the outcome of the Dutch referendum of 6 April 2016 concerning the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. The result of the referendum raised the question whether a single Member State can ‘veto’ the entry into force of a bilateral association agreement. Due to the unprecedented nature of this situation and the fact that the EU Treaties do no give a clear answer to this question, many issues related to the non-ratification of mixed agreements remain unclear. Therefore, after briefly analysing the ‘mixed’ nature of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and its current legal status, the legal consequences of the Dutch ‘tegen’ (against) are explored, focussing on the provisional application of the agreement. Finally, the solution of the Dutch government to deal with the outcome of the referendum, and some alternatives, are discussed.

Keywords

EU Ukraine Association Agreement Referendum Provisional application Mixed agreements Ratification 

References

  1. Flaesch-Mougin C, Bosse-Platière I (2014) L’application Provisoire des Accords de L’Union Européenne. In: Govaere I, Lannon E, van Elsuwege P, Adam S (eds) The European Union in the World. Essays in Honour of Marc Maresceau. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. Heliskoski J (2001) Mixed Agreements as a Technique for Organizing the International Relations of the European Community and its Member States. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Maresceau M (2010) A Typology of Mixed Bilateral Agreements. In: Hillion C, Koutrakos P (eds) Mixed Agreements Revisited. The EU and its Member States in the World. Hart Publishing, Oxford/PortlandGoogle Scholar
  4. Rosas A (2014) Exclusive, Shared and National Competence in the Context of EU External Relations: Do Such Distinctions Matter? In: Govaere I, Lannon E, Elsuwege P, Adam S (eds) The European Union in the World. Essays in Honour of Marc Maresceau. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Van Elsuwege P (2017) The Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the EU and Kosovo: An Example of Legal Creativity. ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  6. Van der Loo G (2016a) The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. A New Legal Instrument for EU Integration without Membership? Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Van der Loo G (2016b) CETA’s Signature: 38 Statements, A Joint Interpretative Instrument and an Uncertain Future. CEPS Commentary. https://www.ceps.eu/publications/ceta’s-signature-38-statements-joint-interpretative-instrument-and-uncertain-future. Accessed 11 November 2016
  8. Wessel R (2016) The EU Solution to Deal with the Dutch Referendum Result on the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. European Papers. http://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/eu-solution-deal-dutch-referendum-result-on-the-eu-ukraine-association-agreement. Accessed 7 March 2017

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ghent European Law InstituteGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations