Abstract
In order to check whether the jurisdictional rules in the Brussels I-bis Regulation should and could be used in a collective redress context, the goals of the Brussels Regulation are analysed. What is the aim of the Brussels Regulation with respect to jurisdiction and do these goals for example exclude the jurisdictional grounds in collective redress proceedings? These issues will be covered in this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Case C-125/92 Mulox v. Geels [1993], ECR I-4075, para 11. See also Pontier and Burg 2004, p. 93.
- 2.
See Pontier and Burg 2004, p. 94. Since courts do not have to go into the substance of the matter in the case of a mass dispute, this sub-principle will not be covered here.
- 3.
See Case C-241/83, Rösler v. Rottwinkel [1985], ECR 99, para 23. See also Case C-269/95 Benincasa v. Dentalkit [1997], ECR I-3767, para 28. See also Pontier and Burg 2004, pp. 95–97.
- 4.
See Pontier and Burg 2004, p. 107.
- 5.
See Pontier and Burg 2004, p. 107.
- 6.
See Chap. 8, footnote 28.
- 7.
Case C-220/84 Autoteile v. Malhé [1985], ECR I-2273, para 15. See also Pontier and Burg 2004, p. 56.
- 8.
Since the sub-principles that belong to the principle of ‘party autonomy’ are directly related to two different grounds of jurisdiction, I will not cover them in relation to the other grounds of jurisdiction.
- 9.
See Pontier and Burg 2004, p. 117.
- 10.
Case C-295/95 Farrel v. Long [1997], ECR I-1683, para 19.
- 11.
Practically, there a considerable number of important provisions that supersede the general provision as a ground of jurisdiction. This was set out in the introduction to Part II of this book.
- 12.
For example, see Case C-89/91 Shearson v. TVB [1993], ECR I-139, para 18.
- 13.
See Pontier and Burg 2004, pp. 162 et seq.
- 14.
See Pontier and Burg 2004, p. 232.
Reference
Pontier JA, Burg E (2004) EU principles on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters according to the case law of the European Court of Justice. TMC Asser Press, The Hague
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 T.M.C. Asser Press and the author
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bosters, T. (2017). Goals of the Brussels Regulation Regarding Jurisdiction. In: Collective Redress and Private International Law in the EU. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-186-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-186-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague
Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-185-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-186-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)