Skip to main content
  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the policy processes that preceded the adoption of the PCP and the policy actions that were subsequently undertaken, in order to boost its implementation in practice. The Chapter focuses on the political support and the relevant policy measures adopted in this context by the different EU institutions which have a say in the innovation policy arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gulbrandsen 1999, 230.

  2. 2.

    Commission 2005, 8.

  3. 3.

    The European Council is the organ which gives the political impetus to the Union’s economic, social and environmental action. It is formed of the heads of the Member States.

  4. 4.

    Expert Group 2006.

  5. 5.

    Council 2001, paras 19–21.

  6. 6.

    Council 2002, paras 47–48.

  7. 7.

    Council 2002, paras 12, 29.

  8. 8.

    Council 2003, 14.

  9. 9.

    Council 2003, 4.

  10. 10.

    Council 2003, 25.

  11. 11.

    Council 2004, 2.

  12. 12.

    Commission 2005b.

  13. 13.

    Council 2005, paras 13, 19.

  14. 14.

    French, German, UK Governments 2004.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., 6.

  16. 16.

    Council 2006a, paras 22, 34.

  17. 17.

    Council 2007, 11–2.

  18. 18.

    Council 2008.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., paras 7, 11.

  20. 20.

    The EU-US gap in public R&D expenditure was reportedly increasing and the GDP share of early-stage venture capital in the US was still more than 50 % higher as compared to the EU. See European Innovation Scoreboard 2007, p. 17; Pro Inno Europe 2007.

  21. 21.

    Council 2008.

  22. 22.

    Council 2010, 11.

  23. 23.

    Council 2011, 8.

  24. 24.

    Council 2012, para 18.

  25. 25.

    Council 2013a, para 16.

  26. 26.

    Council 2013b, 8.

  27. 27.

    Council 2013b, 9.

  28. 28.

    Council 2015a.

  29. 29.

    Council 2015b, para 12.

  30. 30.

    Commission 2013.

  31. 31.

    See https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en.

  32. 32.

    Commission 2002, 14.

  33. 33.

    Commission 2003.

  34. 34.

    Arts 23 and 29 Directive 2004/18/EC.

  35. 35.

    Wilkinson et al. 2005.

  36. 36.

    Gheorghiou et al. 2003, Business Decisions Limited 2003.

  37. 37.

    Gallup Organization 2009, 59.

  38. 38.

    Kok et al. 2004.

  39. 39.

    Wilkinson et al. 2005.

  40. 40.

    Aho et al. 2006.

  41. 41.

    The 2006 innovation strategy is the predecessor to the current EU innovation policy (Innovation Union Flagship).

  42. 42.

    Edler and Georghiou 2007, 958.

  43. 43.

    Council 2006b, 2.

  44. 44.

    Commission 2006, 11.

  45. 45.

    Commission 2007c.

  46. 46.

    Commission 2007a.

  47. 47.

    Technopolis 2011.

  48. 48.

    Ernst & Young and CEP 2011, 14.

  49. 49.

    Ernst & Young and CEP 2011, 17.

  50. 50.

    Directive 2014/24/EU and Directive 2014/25/EU.

  51. 51.

    Commission 2005c, 8.

  52. 52.

    PCP Expert Group 2006.

  53. 53.

    ISTAG 2006, Aho et al. 2006.

  54. 54.

    Commission 2009, 3. The Commission underlines the world leadership Europe holds in ICT application markets such as telemedicine and medical equipment, in automotive and aerospace electronics, and in embedded ICT. See also Joint Research Centre 2008.

  55. 55.

    The ICT sector generates more than a fifth of all patents in Europe. See Joint Research Center 2008.

  56. 56.

    In 2009, the ICT sector and ICT products were considered responsible for about 2 % of global GHG emissions and this harmful contribution was expected to grow quickly. See also OECD 2009.

  57. 57.

    For example, by making significant savings in energy possible, in sectors such as transport, buildings and in manufacturing, ICT technologies are expected to help reduce 20 % of the CO2 emissions in Europe by 2020. See Commission, ‘A European Economic Recovery Plan’ COM 2008 800 final. See also COM 2009, 116.

  58. 58.

    PCP Expert Group 4.

  59. 59.

    These reasons could also be valid for the deployment of PCP in other sectors.

  60. 60.

    PCP Expert Group 9.

  61. 61.

    PCP Expert Group 10.

  62. 62.

    PCP Expert Group 5.

  63. 63.

    According to the PCP Expert Group 24, before deciding to invest in R&D projects, companies calculate the value of the different investment options as a function of time of the upside commercialisation potential and the downside risk that the project will not be well received in the market. Products destined to the public market have a limited upside commercialisation potential due to the smaller size of the public market and to the risk aversion of public procurers.

  64. 64.

    PCP Expert Group 24.

  65. 65.

    PCP Expert Group18.

  66. 66.

    PCP Expert Group 11.

  67. 67.

    PCP Expert Group 6.

  68. 68.

    Only recently, there has been increased attention for more measurement methodologies of the impact of demand-side policies. These may provide solid proof on the impact of PCP in the EU and may offer suggestions for improvements in its implementation. See Edler et al. 2012, 21.

  69. 69.

    Commission 2007b, 3.

  70. 70.

    PCP Expert Group.

  71. 71.

    Commission 2007b.

  72. 72.

    Commission 2009, 6, 11.

  73. 73.

    RFEC is the Regions for Economic Change programme is a European Commission initiative for the 2007–2013 period aiming at funding good regional practices with a particular focus on innovation. FP7 (Framework Programme 7) is EU’s programme aimed at funding research and covering the period 2007–2013. CIP (Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme) is EU’s funding framework for innovation activities, with a focus on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). CIP runs from 2007 to 2013 as well.

  74. 74.

    UNU-MERIT 2011, 20 http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/iu-scoreboard-2010_en.pdf Accessed 26 March 2013.

  75. 75.

    Ibid.

  76. 76.

    Commission 2010a.

  77. 77.

    COM 2010b, 14.

  78. 78.

    COM 2010a, commitment no. 17.

  79. 79.

    Commission 2010a, 25.

  80. 80.

    Commission 2010a.

  81. 81.

    Commission 2010c, d. Key action 9 states that the Commission will try to leverage more private investment through the strategic use of pre-commercial procurement.

  82. 82.

    Council 2011.

  83. 83.

    Rigby et al. 2012.

  84. 84.

    Bertrand Wert 2015.

  85. 85.

    See http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/pcp/calls_en.html.

  86. 86.

    Recital (47) Directive 2014/24/EU and Recital (57) Directive 2014/25/EU.

  87. 87.

    Bedin et al. 2015.

  88. 88.

    See: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/training-promotion-and-local-implementation-assistance-pcp-and-ppi Accessed 7 June 2016.

  89. 89.

    European Parliament 2007.

  90. 90.

    European Parliament 2008, paras 6, 29.

  91. 91.

    European Parliament 2008, paras 33–36.

  92. 92.

    European Parliament 2008, para 21.

  93. 93.

    The Parliament stressed the importance of the EU Technology Platforms and of continuous knowledge transfer between technologically innovative universities, institutes and contracting authorities for finding suitable technology areas for PCP. European Parliament 2008, p. 7.

  94. 94.

    European Parliament 2010.

  95. 95.

    European Parliament 2010, para 140.

  96. 96.

    European Parliament 2011.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramona Apostol .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 T.M.C. Asser Press and the author

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Apostol, R. (2017). Political Background to PCP Adoption—An Institutional Approach. In: Trials and Tribulations in the Implementation of Pre-Commercial Procurement in Europe. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-156-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-156-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-155-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-156-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships