Advertisement

Legal Constraints in the Interpretation of Genocide

  • Mélanie Vianney-Liaud
Chapter
Part of the International Criminal Justice Series book series (ICJS, volume 6)

Abstract

Crimes committed by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia in the 1970s are known as being among the most violent atrocities of the 20th century. Yet, the legal characterization of such acts as genocide has been subject of serious legal controversies beyond the ECCC. As a consequence genocide charges have only been retained in Case 002 against the last Khmer Rouge senior leaders, and those charges are very restricted and does not include the majority of the Cambodian victims. Such a decision irrefutably disappoints many victims who consider that their suffering was not recognized by the ECCC. This chapter identifies and analyses the legal constraints with respect to the legal characterization of the Khmer Rouge atrocities as a crime of genocide.

Keywords

Genocide Protected groups Minority groups Political groups Genocidal intent Nullum crimen sine lege Customary international law 

References

  1. Akhavan P (2012) Reducing Genocide to Law: Definition, Meaning, and the Ultimate Crime. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambos K (2009) What does ‘intent to destroy’ in genocide mean? International Review of the Red Cross 91:833-858Google Scholar
  3. Ardema A (2006) The Crimes to be judged by the Extraordinary Chambers. In: Ciorciari J (ed) The Khmer Rouge Tribunal. Documentation Center of Cambodia, Phnom Penh, pp 57-79Google Scholar
  4. Ascensio, H (2010) Les groupes protégés par la Convention sur le Génocide. In: Yotopoulos-Marangopoulos A, Pazartzis P (eds) Le génocide revisité/Genocide Revisited, Bruylant, Athènes/Bruxelles, pp 45-61Google Scholar
  5. Bogdan A (2002) Cumulative Charges, Convictions and Sentencing at the Ad hoc International Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Melbourne Journal of International Law 3:1-32Google Scholar
  6. Boyle D (1999) Quelle justice pour les Khmers Rouges? Revue trimestrielle de droit de l’homme 40:773-826Google Scholar
  7. Boyle D (2004) Les Nations Unies et le Cambodge, 1979-2003: Autodétermination, démocratie, justice pénale internationale. Panthéon-Assas Paris University IIGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciorciari J, Chang Y (2005) Documenting the Crimes of Democratic Kampuchea. In: Ramji J, Van Schaack B (eds) Bringing the Khmer Rouge to Justice - Prosecuting Mass Violence Before the Cambodian Courts, Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York, pp 222-307Google Scholar
  9. Côté L (2006) International Criminal Justice: Tightening up the Rules of the Game. International Review of the Red Cross 88:133-144Google Scholar
  10. Etcheson C (2006) A ‘Fair and Public Trial’: A Political History of the Extraordinary Chambers. Open Society Justice Initiative, Phnom Penh, pp 7-24Google Scholar
  11. Forster T (2012) The Khmer Rouge and the Crime of Genocide – Issues of Genocidal Intent With Regard to the Khmer Rouge Mass Atrocities. Dike Verlag, Zurich/St. GallenGoogle Scholar
  12. Giry S (2014) The Genocide That Wasn’t, The New York Review of Books www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/aug/25/khmer-rouge-genocide-wasnt. Accessed 15 June 2015Google Scholar
  13. Greenawalt A (1999) Rethinking Genocidal Intent: The Case for a Knowledge-Based Interpretation. Columbia Law Review 99:2259-2294Google Scholar
  14. Hannum H (1989) International Law and Cambodian Genocide: The Sounds of Silence. Human Rights Quarterly 11:82-138Google Scholar
  15. Heder S (2007) Racism, Marxism, Labelling and Genocide in Ben Kiernan’s ‘The Pol Pot Regime’, The South East Asia Research 5:101-153.Google Scholar
  16. Jarvis H, Fawthrop T (2004) Getting Away With Genocide? Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiernan B (1996) The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power and Genocide in Cambodia Under the Khmer Rouge - 1975-79. Yale University Press, New Haven, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Lemkin R (1944) Axe’s Rule in Occupied Europe. Carnegie, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Linton S (2007) Putting Cambodia’s Extraordinary Chambers Into Context. Singapore Yearbook of International Law 9:195-259Google Scholar
  20. Lisson D (2008) Defining ‘National Group’ in the Genocide Convention: A Case Study of Timor-Leste. Stanford Law Review 60:1459-1496Google Scholar
  21. Mohan M (2008) Reconstituting the “Un-Person”: the Khmer Krom & the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. Singapore Yearbook of International Law and Contributors 12:43-55Google Scholar
  22. Nersessian D (2005) Rethinking Cultural Genocide Under International Law. Human Rights Dialogue: ‘Cultural Rights’Google Scholar
  23. Nersessian D (2010) Genocide and Political Groups. Oxford University Press, New York http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/archive/dialogue/2_12/section_1/5139.html. Accessed 15 June 2015Google Scholar
  24. Nouwen S (2006) Hybrid courts: The Hybrid Category of a New Type of International Crimes Courts. Utrecht Law Review 2:190-214Google Scholar
  25. Olivie A, Muwero H (2009) Textual Discrepancies in the Law on the Establishment of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia for the Prosecution of Crimes Committed during the Period of Democratic Kampuchea and their Legal Consequences. International Human Rights Clinic, Seattle UniversityGoogle Scholar
  26. Park R (2011) Proving Genocidal Intent: International Precedent and ECCC Case 002. Rutgers Law Review 63:129-191Google Scholar
  27. Ponchaud F (2001) Cambodge, année zero. Kailash, PondichéryGoogle Scholar
  28. Ponchaud F (2013) L’impertinent du Cambodge, entretiens avec Dane Cuypers. Magellan & Cie, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Ponchaud F (2014) Brève histoire du Cambodge. Magellan & Cie, ParisGoogle Scholar
  30. Quigley J (2006) The Genocide Convention: An International Law Analysis. Ashgate, Aldershot UKGoogle Scholar
  31. Ratner S, Abrams J, Bischoff J (2009) Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law - Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Schabas W (2000) Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Schabas W (2001) Problems of International Codification – Were the Atrocities in Cambodia and Kosovo Genocide? New England Law Review 35:287-302Google Scholar
  34. Sémelin J (2005) Purifier et Détruire, Usages politiques des massacres et génocide. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Sher S (2004) Le Kampuchéa des ‘Khmers rouges’: Essai de compréhension d’une tentative de révolution. L’Harmattan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  36. Simon T (2007) The Law of Genocide: Prescriptions For a Just World. Greenwood Publishing Group, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  37. Sliwinski M (1995) Le génocide khmer rouge : une analyse démographique. L’Harmattan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  38. Ternon Y (1995) L’Etat criminel - Les génocides au XXème siècle. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Schaak B (1997) The Crime of Political Genocide: Repairing the Genocide Convention’s Blind Spot. Yale Law Journal 106:2259-2291Google Scholar
  40. Williams S (2004) The Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers - A Dangerous Precedent for International Justice? International & Comparative Law Quarterly 53:209-227Google Scholar
  41. Young R (2010) How Do We Know Them When We See Them? The Subjective Evolution in the Identification of Victim Groups for the Purpose of Genocide. International Criminal Law Review 10:1-22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aix-Marseille University IIIAix-En-ProvenceFrance

Personalised recommendations