Abstract
This book has investigated how the ICTs should interpret and apply international human rights norms in their procedural practice. The working hypothesis was that the specific context in which the ICTs operate has an impact on their interpretation and application of human rights norms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
References
Boas G (2008) The Case for a New Appellate Jurisdiction for International Criminal Law. In: Göran Sluiter, Sergey Vasiliev (eds), International Criminal Procedure—Towards a Coherent Body of Law. Cameron May, pp 417–455
D’Aspremont J, Brölmann C (2010) Challenging International Criminal Tribunals before Domestic Courts. In: August Reinisch (ed) Challenging Acts of International Organizations before National Courts. Oxford University Press, pp 111–136
Schabas W (2011) Synergy or Fragmentation? International Criminal Law and the European Convention on Human Rights. J Int’l Crim Just 9:609
Zappalà S (2010) The Rights of Victims v. the Rights of the Accused. J Int’l Crim Just 8:137
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 T.M.C. Asser Press and the author
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zeegers, K. (2016). Summary and Conclusion. In: International Criminal Tribunals and Human Rights Law. International Criminal Justice Series, vol 5. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-102-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-102-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague
Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-101-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-102-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)
