National Parliaments and EU Economic Governance. In Search of New Ways to Enhance Democratic Legitimacy

Chapter

Abstract

The current economic crisis has challenged the democratic model of representation within the European Union. The author mentions three fundamental tensions that characterize the legal position of EU states: First, the tension between national sovereignty and economic stability; second, the tension between executive and legislative powers; third, the tension of the gradual introduction and development of redistributive policies at the European level. According to the author, the debate on the ‘democratic deficit’ is still alive. One of the strongest points of critique on the entire EU has been that there is no concrete democratic path for the national governments. Many measures have been taken to address the economic crisis, such as treaties and soft law instruments. These have led to a new EU Economic Governance Model, where public finance and macroeconomic policies of member states are being coordinated. EU institutions are, on one hand, involved via the European Semester and on the other hand via special procedures in case of problems. The author considers the role of the European Parliament still weak in this issue, as it has no real powers. Arguments therefore arise for stronger national parliaments, for example to compensate this lack of power. The author reminds that national governments are still the key players in defining national economic policies. Although the procedural role of national parliaments in the EU dominates, the author claims that the essential issue is which substantive roles they must pursue in the field of economics.

Keywords

European Council National Sovereignty National Parliament Democratic Legitimacy Economic Governance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Borger V (2013) How the Debt Crisis Exposes the Development of Solidarity in the Euro Area. Eur Const Law Rev 9(1):7–36Google Scholar
  2. Corbett R, Jacobs F, Shackleton M (2007) The European Parliament, 7th edn. Harper, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Craig PP (2012) The Stability, Coordination and Governance Treaty: Principle, Politics and Pragmatism. Eur Law Rev 37:231–248Google Scholar
  4. Cygan A (2001) National Parliaments in an Integrated Europe: an Anglo-German perspective. Kluwer International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  5. Cygan A (2011) The Parliamentarisation of EU Decision-Making? The Impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on National Parliaments. Eur Law Rev 36:478–497Google Scholar
  6. Cygan A (2012a) Collective Subsidiarity Monitoring by National Parliaments after Lisbon—The Operation of the Early Warning Mechanism. In: Trybus M, Rubini L (eds) After Lisbon: The Future of European Law and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 55–73Google Scholar
  7. Cygan A (2012b) National Parliaments within the EU Polity—no Longer Losers but Hardly Victorious. ERA Forum 12(4):517–533Google Scholar
  8. Emmerik ML, Diamant M (2013) Het Nederlandse budgetrecht in Europees perspectief. Tijdschrift voor Constitutioneel Recht 4(2):115Google Scholar
  9. Jancic D (2012) The Barroso Initiative: Window Dressing or Democracy Boost? Utrecht Law Rev 8(1):78Google Scholar
  10. Kiiver Ph (2006) National Parliaments in the European Union. Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  11. Laursen F, Pappas SA (eds) (1995) The changing Role of Parliaments in Europe, EIPAGoogle Scholar
  12. Nettesheim M (2005) Developing a Theory of Democracy for the European Union. Berkeley J Int Law 23:358Google Scholar
  13. Niblock M (1971) The EEC: National Parliaments in Community Decision-making. Chatham House, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Norton Ph (ed) (1996) National Parliaments and the European Union. Frank Gass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Pernice I (2002) Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union. Eur Law Rev 2002:511Google Scholar
  16. Piris JC (2010) The Treaty of Lisbon. A legal and political analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith E (ed) (1996) National parliaments as cornerstones of European integration. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  18. van den Brink A (2011) Substantiating Subsidiarity. The Interpretation and Meaning of the Principle after Lisbon. In: Trybus M, Rubini L (eds) The Future of European law after Lisbon. Edward Elger Publishers, Birmingham, pp 160–178Google Scholar
  19. Walker N (2002) The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. Modern Law Rev 65(3):317–359Google Scholar
  20. Weiler JHH (1995) Does Europe need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision. Eur Law J 1(3):219–258Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Europa Institute of Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations