Abstract
Collaboration plays an essential role in shaping the future of research and higher education. Governments and policy-makers around the world increasingly call upon the scientific community to solve the grand challenges of contemporary society, such as climate change, aging populations, food security, and resource management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature, 497, 557–560.
Bennett, L. M., Gadlin, H., & Levine-Finley, S. (2010). Collaboration and team science: A field guide. Washington, DC: National Institutes for Health.
Bennett, L. M., & Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science: From theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60(5), 768–775.
Bernstein, A. (2013). Link the world’s best investigators. Natrure, 496, 27–28.
Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Business.
Budtz Pedersen, D. (2013). How do we evaluate interdisciplinary research? Science Nordic http://sciencenordic.com, December 20.
Cartwright, N. (2009). The dappled world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2008). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press.
Dantas, E., & Bell, M. (2005). The co-evolution of firm-centered knowledge networks and capabilities in late industrializing countries. World Development, 39(9), 1570–1591.
Durst, S., & Poutanen, P. (2013). Success factors of innovation ecosystems: A literature review. In R. Smeds & O. Irrmann (Eds.), The boundary-crossing conference on co-design in innovation (pp. 27– 38). Aalto University Publication Series.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
Foray, D., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. In D. Foray & B.-Å. Lundvall (Eds.), Employment and growth in the knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD.
Frodeman, R. (2011). Interdisciplinary research and academic sustainability: Managing knowledge in an age of accountability. Environmental Conservation, 38(2), 105–112.
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2013). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. SSRN Working paper.
Holbrook, J. B. (2012). What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration. Synthese (online-first).
Holbrook, J. B. (2013). Peer review of team science research. Working Paper. National Academy of Sciences. www.nationalacademies.org, accessed 3 April 2014.
Huutoniemi, K., Klein, J. K., Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39, 79–88.
Jessop, B. (1995). The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism, economy and society. Blackwell Publishing.
Kaiser, U., & Kuhn, J. M. (2012). Long-run effects of public–private research joint ventures: The case of the Danish Innovation Consortia support scheme. Research Policy, 41(5), 913–927.
Klein, J. T. (2008). Education. In G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem et al. (Eds.), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 399–401). Dordrecht: Springer.
Klein, J. T. (2010). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures. San Francisco: Jossey Bass and the Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. London: Demos.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moulier Boutang, Y. (2012). Cognitive capitalism. London: Polity Press.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Poyiadgi, M. (2014). Accreditation will be central to the success of Moocs. The Financial Times, 9 March 2014, www.ft.com, accessed 24 March 2014.
Preston, F. (2013). A global redesign? Shaping the circular economy. March, 2012. Chatham House: Royal Institute of International Affairs. 13 June.
Rabinow, P., & Bennett, G. (2008). Human practices: Interfacing three modes of collaboration. In Bedau & Parke (Eds.), The prospect of protocells: Social and ethical implications of recreating life. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Read, J. (2009). University experience: Neoliberalism against the commons. In The Edu-factory Collective (Eds.), Toward a global autonomous university. Cognitive labor, the production of knowledge, and exodus from the education factory (pp. 151–154). New York: Autonomedia.
Serra, G. (2012). Cognitive capitalism by Yann Moulier Boutang. London School of Economics Review of Books, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/, accessed 24 March 2014.
Sundararajan, A. (2012). Why the government doesn’t need to regulate the sharing economy. Wired Magazine, 22 October.
Vercellone, C. (2009). Cognitive capitalism and models for the regulation of wage relations. In The Edu-factory Collective (Eds.), Toward a global autonomous university. Cognitive labor, the production of knowledge, and exodus from the education factory (pp. 119–125). New York: Autonomedia.
Wagner, C. S., Roessner, J. D., Bobb, K., Klein, J. T., Boyack, K. W., Keyton, J., Rafols, I., & Börner, K. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research. Journal of Informetrics, 165, 14–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pedersen, D.B. (2015). Collaborative Knowledge2 . In: Westergaard, E., Wiewiura, J.S. (eds) On the Facilitation of the Academy. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-974-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-974-6_5
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-974-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)