Skip to main content

Neo-Liberal Education Policy in China

Issues and Challenges in Curriculum Reform

  • Chapter
Spotlight on China

Part of the book series: Spotlight on China ((SPOT))

Abstract

A quick glance at the historical developments of China since the early 1980s, and particularly focusing on the introduction of market reforms and the Open Door policy (Guan, 2000) reflects the nation’s deliberate move away from a centrally planned regime to one where markets perform a greater role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Apple, M. (2000). Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism: Education and conservatism in a global context. In N. Burbules & C. Torres (Eds.), Globalisation and education – Critical perspectives (pp. 57–77). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, C. (2006). Educational decentralisation: Asian experiences and conceptual contributions. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BOP Consulting. (2012). World cities report 2012 (pp. 1–147). London: Office of the Mayor of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (1999). Globalisation and educational reform: What planners need to know. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. (2009). Shanghai rising: State power and local transformation in a global megacity. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2005). The (im)possibility of intellectual work in neoliberal regimes. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 26(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher rducation: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, S. (2006). Challenging the paradigm: Notes on developing an indigenised teacher education curriculum. Improving Schools, 9(3), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, X. (2000). China’s social policy: Reform and development in the context of marketisation and globalisation. Social Policy and Administration, 34(1), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannaway, J., & Carnoy, M. (1993). Decentralisation and school improvement: Can we fulfil the promise? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. (1999). Introduction. In N. Chomsky (Ed.), Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order (pp. 6–17). New York, NY: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Ceallaigh, J. (2013). Shanghai’s new landmark: China’s tallest building. Telegraph. (London: Telegraph Media)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (2008). Scales of exception: Experiments with knowledge and sheer life in tropical Southeast Asia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 29, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. (2005). Shanghaishi jiaoyu weiyuanhui, Shanghaishi renmin zhenfu jiaoyu dudaoshi guanyu yingfa ‘Shanghaishi jiji tuijing zhongxiaoxue “xuexiao fazhanxing dudao pingjia” de shishi yijian’ [Notice by the Shanghai municipal education commission and Shanghai municipal people’s government educational supervisory of fice on issuing some opinions on deepening and perfecting the work of ‘school developmental supervision and evaluation’]. Retrieved March 12, 2012 from http://www.shmec.gov.cn/html/xxgk/200501/410012005001.php

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. (2010b). Shanghaishi zhongchangqi jiaoyu gaige he fazhan guihua gangyao (2010–2020). [Synopsis of Shanghai’s middle and long term education reform and development plan (2010–2020)]. Retrieved March 2, 2012 from http://www.shmec.gov.cn/html/xxgk/201009/301122010002.php

  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. (n.d.). Shanghaishi putong zhongxiaoxue kecheng fangan (shixing gao) shuoming (shehui ban) [Explanation for the trial curriculum plan for ordinary secondary and primary schools in Shanghai (social version)]. Retrieved March 2, 2012 from www.shmec.gov.cn/attach/article/72.doc

  • Shanghai Municipal Government. (2010a). Shanghai yearbook 2009. Shanghai: Shanghai Municipal Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y. S. (2006). Kecheng pingjia [Classroom appraisal]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeter, C. (2008). Equity, democracy, and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1947–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2011). Framing educational success: A comparative study of Shanghai and Singapore. Education, Knowledge and Economy, 5(3), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2012). The culture of education policy making: Curriculum reform in Shanghai. Critical Studies in Education, 53(2), 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2013). Confucius. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2013). Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on achieving educational success. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Karl, R. (2004). The year 1989 and the historical roots of neoliberalism in China. Positions: East Asia Cultures Critiques, 12(1), 7–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L. (2007). The implications of the ideology of the second curriculum reforms on learning [Er qi ke gai li nian guan dian de xue xi]. Retrieved September 15, 2011 from http://www.anzhong.sh.cn/po40/info_detail.jsp?infoId=info29000000628

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2007). China and the whole child. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhonggong zhongyang guanyu jingyibu jiaqiang he gaijing xuexiao deyu gongzuo de ruogan yijian [Several opinions of the CPC Central Committee on further strengthening and improving moral education in schools]. (1994). Retrieved March 8, 2013 from http://gaige.rednet.cn/c/2008/06/30/1539947.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tan, C., Reyes, V. (2016). Neo-Liberal Education Policy in China. In: Guo, S., Guo, Y. (eds) Spotlight on China. Spotlight on China. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-881-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-881-7_2

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-881-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics